Marriage is a Recent Invention – And Infidelity is More Natural Than You Think
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:23:28 GMT
No. 25772278
[
Kohl]
[
Report thread]
Marriage, as we know it, only emerged around 2350 BCE in Sumer (modern-day southern Iraq). This means the institution is just over 4,000 years old—a blink of an eye in human history.
To put things in perspective: Homo sapiens appeared in Africa around 200,000 years ago. For most of our existence, there was no marriage, dating, or fixed monogamous relationships. Our ancestors lived in vastly different social structures, with sexual behaviors we would now consider anarchic. Monogamy, in reality, is a cultural construct, not a biological rule.
If Marriage Isn’t Natural, Why Does It Exist?
Marriage was created as a tool for social organization—to establish inheritance, political alliances, and control over reproduction. It didn’t arise from "romantic love" but from economic and power-driven needs.
What About Infidelity? It’s More Common Than You Think
If human sexual behavior has always been flexible and non-monogamous by nature, it’s no surprise that infidelity is so frequent. Statistics show that between 20% and 50% of people cheat at some point in their lives. This isn’t a "moral failing"—it’s often a reflection of desires that rigid monogamy tries to suppress.
Conclusion: Dating and Marriage Aren’t "Natural"
The idea that monogamous relationships are "the only right way to love" is a cultural invention, not a law of nature. Infidelity, on the other hand, is as old as humanity itself—as common as drinking water when thirsty.
This doesn’t mean marriage or monogamy are "wrong"—only that they are choices, not biological obligations. Understanding this can help us build more honest and less hypocritical relationships.
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:27:53 GMT
No. 25772317
>>25772356
Women domesticated animals by having sex with them.
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:28:22 GMT
No. 25772324
>Marriage, as we know it, only emerged around 2350 BCE in Sumer
>For most of our existence, there was no marriage, dating, or fixed monogamous relationships.
>Monogamy, in reality, is a cultural construct, not a biological rule.
I see no proofs presented.
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:28:50 GMT
No. 25772330
>>25772278
is this how you cope with being a bastard that no women want to marry?
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:42:51 GMT
No. 25772422
>>25778177
>Its only over 4000 years old!!
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:47:21 GMT
No. 25772474
>>25772278
> Statistics show that between 20% and 50% of people cheat at some point in their lives.
Does it mean 50-80% never cheated in their life? If we include niggers and brown people in this stats doesn't look that bad. I still have hope.
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:49:02 GMT
No. 25772491
Why Sex Originating from Prostitution (with Cis and Trans Women) Can Be Healthier Than Dating and Marriage
In modern society, traditional romantic relationships—dating and marriage—are often idealized as the ultimate forms of emotional and sexual fulfillment. However, these structures come with significant psychological, social, and economic burdens that can make them less healthy than alternative arrangements, including paid sexual encounters with cisgender and transgender women. Here’s why:
1. Clear Expectations and Boundaries
Prostitution operates on transparent agreements: money is exchanged for a specific service, with no hidden emotional obligations. In contrast, romantic relationships often involve unspoken expectations, leading to frustration, manipulation, and emotional distress when those expectations aren’t met.
2. No Emotional Dependency or Toxic Attachments
Dating and marriage frequently foster codependency, jealousy, and power struggles. Paid encounters, however, allow for sexual satisfaction without the complications of emotional entanglement, reducing the risk of toxic dynamics.
3. Freedom from Societal Pressures
Marriage and long-term relationships come with societal expectations (monogamy, financial stability, family approval) that can create stress. Engaging with sex workers eliminates these pressures, allowing individuals to explore their desires without judgment.
4. Reduced Risk of Deception
Many romantic relationships are built on false pretenses—people hide their true intentions, manipulate emotions for financial gain, or stay in unhappy unions due to social stigma. In transactional sex, honesty is prioritized: both parties know the nature of the interaction.
5. Exploration Without Judgment
For those attracted to both cis and trans women, prostitution provides a space to explore preferences without fear of rejection or fetishization accusations that can arise in conventional dating.
6. Lower Long-Term Financial and Legal Risks
Divorce can lead to financial ruin, child custody battles, and prolonged emotional suffering. Paid sex avoids these risks, offering satisfaction without long-term legal entanglements.
Conclusion
While society often stigmatizes prostitution, it can be a more honest, low-pressure, and emotionally safer alternative to the complexities of dating and marriage. By removing unrealistic romantic ideals, transactional sex allows for clearer boundaries, personal freedom, and a healthier approach to fulfilling sexual needs.
Bernd
Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:51:59 GMT
No. 25772521
SÄGE!
The hue tranny is literally worse than kikes, niggers, and women. That shithole needs more tariffs
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:13:36 GMT
No. 25778169
>>25772278
>For most of our existence, there was no marriage, dating, or fixed monogamous relationships.
You're just making shit up.
I would hunt you down and kill you, but you're already suffering worse than mere mortals can inflict on you living in Bundaland.
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:15:17 GMT
No. 25778177
>>25778423
>>25772422
Hardly 1% of human existence.
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:16:05 GMT
No. 25778181
>>25778202
There are plenty of animal species like birds and wolves that pair bond for life, I don't see why humans should be any different because generally human evolution is the pinnacle and most civilized of animal kingdom
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:18:31 GMT
No. 25778202
>>25778181
>I don't see why humans should be any different
War. At least since the Neolithic losers of war being put to the sword has caused m:f ratios to be highly imbalanced. Research has shown that most men did not breed, presumably dying in battle before successfully breeding.
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:53:32 GMT
No. 25778383
even by evolutionary standarts letting your woman cuck you with random people is a bad way to secure your own genes
i guess this is what this soy science all about, promiscuity and onlyfans advertisement
Bernd
Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:58:33 GMT
No. 25778423
>>25778177
So what? Society is growing and it can't exist by the rules of gang of primates counting from 20 to 40 individuals