I already made this question tons of times, the answer is pretty simple but keins won't admit it, instead they will make up an excuse as to why Hitler is 'eviler'. The reason that he is portrayed as such is only because of the media, who relays you the garbage they want you to see or hear. And who owns the media? There is your answer.

>>25765518 >Napoleon He's very vilified in Russia at least.

hitler tilted against the jews, whereas napoleon and tamujin were working for them.

We were smart hénaff not to kill Jews, unlike your dumb Austrian failed painter.

The media doesn't give a shit about Genghis Khan, Stalin, or Mao because they never mass-slaughtered you-know-who.

Gengis Khan is a hero: 1) Killed ir*nians 2) Destroyed pisslamic version of vatican by sacking Baghdad

genghis wasn't a nationalist thus he wasn't a threat to jews all manners of people were allowed to live under mongols even when they converted to islam. this is why jews also prefer muslims over christians, since tolerance of jews is islamic law

>>25765549 >this is why jews also prefer muslims over christians that's bullshit and you know it

>>25765549 >jews also prefer muslims over christians What a fucking retard you are.

>>25765538 Stop lying, shart. Your whole anticommunist propaganda is basedon bullshit stories about how Stalin and Mao are LITERALLYWORSE THAN HITLER!

Cuz Hitler killed da choooosen Peepol. No one cares about Jews anymore. Brown people certainly don't. Only far left liberals and commies pretend to care about kikes.

>>25765518 I hear Napoleon was Europe's big bad bogeyman before Hitler was.

>>25765654 That is never emphasized in the schools or classrooms, I'm not sure where you're getting your information from, gypsoid.

Crazy that you need to compare him to Genghis Khan when we live in the age of Zionism where people like Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich are running free. Typical goyman, I guess.

what a stupid question ghenghis khan was a total winner napoleon had flawless biography until he lost gitler was just a soy loser he conquered some land just for few years then he lost even more what's the reason of glorifying him? because he killed da joos? because germany had few decent years until it turned into a total catastrophe and as a direct result of his actions germany is now cucked beyond comprehension? mediocre at best painter, a shitty leader, absolutely retarded commander, good orator, that's it.

1. He's a loser. 2. WWII was not so much time ago. People who was born after 2000 will forget about the war soon. Further the memory will only fade.

Hitler was bad, m'kay? I don't want you getting sucked into anything weird, Bernd, like Hitler worship.

>>25765701 Stop lying, shartmarter. You have brainwashed entire butthurt belt based on this bullshit.

>>25765518 Short answer: Jews.

>>25765654 >moldovan gypsy defending Stalin Is it because he persecuted ethnic Russians to the benefits of subhumans like your people?

Genghis died having expanded his empire into the largest land empire ever, at the top of his game. Hitler died by shooting himself, after shooting his dog, and sending 10 year old Hitler youth boys off to the front line, after getting millions of good men killed for no point. Crippling the whole Europe, ruining it's potential forever.

>>25766048 How hard did the Russian fuck you in the ass to believe bullshit like this?

Napoléon defended his country against foreign invaders who wanted to change the political regime of France. Hitler assaulted his neighbours and decided to industrialy kill jews, disabled, gypsies, homosexuals etc in giant death camps. Gengis Khan was from an other age we don't know as much about. But indeed, he massacred a lot on his way and he's evil.

>>25765843 You're just a schizo gypsoid.

Because Khan has nothing to do with modern ideologies, ethno-nationalism or anything that represents any threat to the people that currently rules the west.

>>25766081 You're right, Hitler didn't shoot his dog he poisoned it

Recency bias. But thank you for reminding me that I wanted to read stuff on the Mongolian empire.

Genghis killed millions of iranians and others who at one point were a threat to jewry and replaced them with mongols who to this day are camel fuckers. Central Asia used to have large cities that were involved in science and arts in the Persian tradition and remained relevant even after the Muslim invasions and Arabicization. The millions who lived there were genocided so slant eyed niggers could take their place. Kalergi tire e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merv#History

>>25765535 the english hate napoleon too, and they were the world's big winners till the world war started.

The modern world is built on the idea that WW2 was won by the good guys, and them winning WW2 is a large aspect of their legitimacy. This goes for both poccnr and walmartia. No one's national identity is based upon beating Boney, not even United Kingdomia.

.

>>25766442 also ignore how integral the soviet union was in that win

Because he lost the most important war.

>>25766442 >The modern world is built on the idea that WW2 was won by the good guys ALL wars are won by the good guys, in a long, historic continuancy. There are no records of opposing facts and opinions, and if you say so, you're an enemy of the current regime.

>>25765537 >We were smart hénaff not to kill Jews, You enabled them You killed your king in the service of the jews.

>>25765518 Because Hitler being the big bad is the founding myth of the modern (post WW2) world. Even the jews don't really matter. Only Hitler bad and anti-Hitler good.

>>25766102 >Napoléon defended his country against foreign invaders

>>25765526 Other anti-jewish fighters like HAMAS are generally portrayed as neutral or good though. It's not the jews. It's just that after WW2, you and the russians needed a bad guy to rally against for the New World Order to work.

>>25770033 >the founding myth of the modern (post WW2) world. > the jews don't really matter LOL

>>25770041 If he hadn't killed jews (if he did), they would have used some other minority. Again, other antisemites get off scot-free, most notably moslems are even treated preferentially in the post WW2 world. Explain that if it's about the jews.

Now that I think about it, the post WW2 world is communist, so it's probably because he was the first really high profile anti-commie. Antisemites get a free pass as long as they're commies, like HAMAS. Anti-commies are demonized even if theyre pro-jew, like McCarthy.

>>25770043 >If he hadn't killed jews (if he did), they would have used some other minority. LOL

>>25765518 1. He is NOT glorified in West. He's always called a monster when he mentioned. 2. He never conducted any ethnic cleansing. And while Mongols in Great Horde held privileged status the Mongols themselves were only then Mongols when they lived Mongol way. So those privileged Mongols didn't mess with conquered societies and from those people point of view they held the same rights as before Mongols arrived. 3. Mongols were extremely tolerant to local cultures. Including religious. For the conquered people there were no perceived oppression. 4. Mongols put extremely reasonable tribute on the conquered people. In fact the tribute was so small that even the smallest tax you can find in history would be huge in comparison. In return to that paltry tribute Mongols provided a very serious protection from other possible invaders. 5. Mongols didn't force free conquered population to any form of forced labor for Mongols. Sure, there was slavery. And also criminals and broke people often worked like semi-slaves, for a free financially well person there was no danger of being forced to work for Mongols for free. Comparing to all other possible conquerors, especially to European colonial empires, Mongols were basically saints as rulers.

>>25765518 >Why is Hitler treated so differently? because in pure german fashion he failed in his attempt, isnt that obvious? you need to win a war or two if you want a statue.

>>25765518 >Why is Hitler seen as the universal evil? Allied propaganda, really. Evil, okay. Universal evil? Nah.

>>25770099 >because in pure german fashion he failed in his attempt, isnt that obvious? So did Napoleon.

>>25770136 Napoleon kinda succeeded in remaking european landscape, it was his further adventures that failed Hitler didnt succeed in anything

>>25770143 >Napoleon kinda succeeded in remaking european landscape >Hitler didnt smh tbh moteris

all the grievances are based on the extraction of wealth. Mongolia is dirt poor and there is nothing to gain from them.

>>25770143 >Napoleon kinda succeeded in remaking european landscape So did Hitler.

>>25770207 that map is such a bullshit. I personally know around 20 jews living in a second rate city (~10% of jewish population according to tha map).

>>25770231 >I know 20 Jews explains a lot of things. Shalom.

because we lost the big one

>>25770219 >Mongolia is dirt poor they have been growing real fast in the last 20 years thanks to mining

>>25770234 I don't mean in a positive canotation. One jew family i was renting an apartment was so awful with their schizophrenia i moved out prematurely.

>>25770240 it is still africa tier

>>25770249 you literally picked the richest per capita countries in Africa Gabon has oil, Botswana - diamonds and white farmers, Namibia - trade with South Africa

>>25770487 this is better?

I think it's more about Germany that Hitlar. Germany is a mad brute and Hitler = Germany. By vilifying Hitler anglo-saxons topple Germany too and cuck it forever so that there won't be another world war.

>>25770509 seriously, I'd say it's not so bad falling below Albania is sad but understandable: moving from literal Stalinist autarky regime to trade with the EU helped Albanians a great deal definitely not dirt poor

Genghis Khan and Napoleon didn't have aim to genocide whole ethnic groups and subraces(like Hitler, who wanted to genocide jews/gypsies/slavs).

>>25770545 if you looked at the graph axis you would see that average albanian is like 50% richer than a mongol.

>>25765518 jewish occupation and destruction of Germans, Europe and the white race

>>25770558 or a Mongol is just 33% poorer but not my point it's on the same order of magnitude, not like 10 times worse off

>>25770556 basically this I would also add the complete humanistic horror of the nation of Kant and Goethe methodically organizing an emotionless killing machine for millions of people

>>25770574 doesn't change anything. mongolia is poor, their women are not super desireable, their workforce is lowly skilled. They can't give anything in return for razing baghdad to the ground and killing almost every inhabitant there.

Hitler was right. That's all you have to know.

>>25770597 Mongolia is landlocked, it's can only trade with the least populated parts of China and Russia, the land there is basically a desert. What surprises me is not the fact it's poor but the fact that Mongols still exist at all.

>>25770597 >>25770654 again, it's not that poor as everybody imagines also, the prospects are not bad: - if China continues to grow - if they still enforce that policy of letting Western mining companies in (there was some alarm in that Canadian company case, but seems they worked it out) >razing baghdad to the ground and killing almost every inhabitant there that was their strategy: massive show of force that others would be afraid to resist - if you submitted they didn't kill anyone, just pay yasak and live how you wish

The liberal concept of history basically assumes people get more civilised with technological and scientific advances.

>>25770662 I don't see a point in this arguing. I know for a fact that in lithuania jews didn't even cared much about restitution until it became clear that they will make millions if not billions by claiming real estate in the city capital.

>>25770722 >I don't see a point in this arguing sure >restitution the issue we will still have to solve when Luka is gone but I read good article on the Polish restitution program and what amazed me is that the biggest problem were not some shabby huts in villages or even Jewish houses in towns, it was the Catholic church lands and buildings

-Genghis Khan lived almost a millenia ago, he's stuff of legend by now, Hitler and the Holocaust are still in the living memory, not even a century ago. -Genghis conquests were military affairs, he never marched whole populations to camps with the specific aim of killing them. -He never aimed to exterminate a whole ethinicity based on racist worldwide views -He never industrialized mass killing like the Holocaust. -Napoleonic wars deaths were a result of wars, not genocide of civilian populations. -Napoleon left a legacy of legal reforms and breakdown of old institutions. Hitler left Germany broke in 2 and tried to exterminate whole ethnicities, with grander plan of killing even more. -Also Napoleon is dead for 200 years, when Hitler left the living memory, his reputation as the ultimate evil will also fade. -And more importantly, Hitler lost. Stalin and Mao killed even more civilians than he, but they didn't lost, they died of old age and disease.

>>25770769 >-Genghis conquests were military affairs, he never marched whole populations to camps with the specific aim of killing them. still ended killing many >-He never aimed to exterminate a whole ethinicity based on racist worldwide views considering some isolated towns consisted of whole ethnicity and culture he did >-He never industrialized mass killing like the Holocaust. he did genocided civilian populations of some conquered towns entirely and systematically If anything people who try to excuse genghis in some way are the jewish scholars themselves who want to keep the holocaust monopoly going on. Did know that rwandan genocide is attributed to the nazis by jewish scholars, because doing colonialism germans appparently seeded the idea to the Hutu?

I guess its for the same reason why romans and mongols susceded and germans lost; they converted conquered people onto assets instead killing them.

Mongols didn't even know about all that before (((russian))) historians taught them about their history, totally not made up. There were no foreign sources about the golden horde as well.

>>25766102 Best leader Europe ever had.

Humans are small brained cucks. Im embarrassed to be a part of this soyciety

>>25770595 >>25770556 > the complete humanistic horror That kike pilpul

Napoleon's wars were defensive, not offensive. He also founded the modern world. Meanwhile Hitler's only contribution is destroying Europe forever in a massive spergout.

>>25770769 > Genghis conquests were military affairs, he never marched whole populations to camps The Siege of Baghdad took place in early 1258. A large army commanded by Hulegu, a prince of the Mongol Empire, attacked the historic capital of the Abbasid Caliphate after a series of provocations from its ruler, caliph al-Musta'sim. Within a few weeks, Baghdad fell and was sacked by the Mongol army—al-Musta'sim was killed alongside hundreds of thousands of his subjects. Between 1219 and 1221,[2] the Mongol forces under Genghis Khan invaded the lands of the Khwarazmian Empire in Central Asia. The campaign, which followed the annexation of the Qara Khitai Khanate, saw widespread devastation and atrocities. The invasion marked the completion of the Mongol conquest of Central Asia, and began the Mongol conquest of Persia. of the bloodiest in human history, with total casualties estimated to be between two and fifteen m In 1221, after the death of Tuqachar, the husband of Genghis Khan's daughter, the entire city of Nishapur was destroyed by the Mongols over the course of 10 days. Genghis Khan's daughter eath of every resid as vengeance for her husband's death. In order to become sure that no wounded would survive the massacre, the Khan's troops killed and beheaded most of the population of the city and re reputedly piled in pyramids by the Mongols. Women, Infants, children, and even cats and dogs were among the beheaded. It is estimated that potentially up to 1,747,000 people we[39] but kikes like OP, dindu nuffin, MUH holliercause

>>25771573 >Napoleon's wars were defensive, not offensive. Hitler's too

>>25765518 Wasn't it initially illegal to be a Napoleon loyalist too?

>>25771688 >they beheaded cats Fucking monsters ...

1. Hitler wrote a book, where the criteria of being superhuman was > to win the total war and arguing about the winner was called > a lowly jewish act 2. He made all the 3rd EU sign on to the book ideas. Everyone. Church, school, academia, big business, small business, military, you name it. 3. Expecting Russians to be weak from Communism and win, affirming 3rd EU status as superhumans, he attacked. 4. He lost. Awarding Russians with the status of Superhumans on the own EU's moral compas. And awarding all the EU layers with a title of the worst subhuman sinner. Again in your own book. hence all the hate that's also the reason why wectern christian-identifying cults lost their appeal in their former audience among white Europeans you can somewhat forgive business for selling you shit, you can let it slide for politicians "they're all faggots anyway", but you can't forgive an institution that has to support you by giving you a reason to live for selling you the idea that you're a subhuman and the worst sinner, that has to beg people you passionately hated your all life to build you a deathcamp, where you can work yourself to death for their benefit

>>25765518 because white liberals and jews run western institutions and are afraid of european nationalism because it's their main competitor to power in the west, so they spread such propaganda, I think they even believe it, look at those bizarre comparisons of elon musk to hitler lol