>rape gangs I sleep <not paying TV loicence OI WANKA YOU GOIN' TO JAIL IN THE NAME OF THY MAJESTY

Do you have to pay the loicense if you have a monitor or VR headset? Also, what about having a streaming subscription or just an internet connection?

Dear Legal Occupier

>>25764822 >monitor Yes, it can be used to access the BBC (not the cock) >VR Probably the same story

>>25764830 So anything with a display connection would force you to pay up? Is there a at least loophole for devices with integrated displays like phones and laptops?

>>25764839 I don't know, I just know about the monitors because I've read a discussion about it before and the same applies in Poland. The main difference between Poland and UK is that our rules are not enforced, but it they wanted they could do UK-style raids on loicence avoiders.

>>25764839 >So anything with a display connection would force you to pay up? In my shithole you're only supposed to pay if your monitor has a tuner inside. I.e. a regular computer monitor doesn't count as a TV.

>>25764848 >>25764850 The UK isn't the only shithole with a TV loicense? What the fuck

I would pay a pack of horny pakis to harass the tv loicense people and expose their hypocrisy. What's the ultimate penalty if you don't pay?

>>25764860 You probably have it too but it's not enforced like in Poland

>>25764860 Nager, if your shithole has public TV channels, who the fuck do you think pays for them ?

>>25764864 You accumulate debt and they bailiffs from High Court go into your house and take your shit away. Watch "Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away!" on jewtube, it's a good system when it comes to social leeches, squatters and debtors, but it's unfortunately used for retarded shit like TV loicence.

>>25764871 I thought it was rolled up with taxes or whatever.

Can't you just send them a letter on bread to inform them you don't own a TV or radio?

>>25764882 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_detector_van

>>25764875 Apparently we have Rundfunkbeitrag. I've never heard of it until now. lol

>>25764889 These could be reused in Ukraine lol

>>25764902 You had better start paying it or they're going to pound your asshole in prison.

>>25764902 Tell me you are 12 and live with your parents without telling me you are 12 and live with your parents.

How long until they charge a smart phone license? Since everybody consumes BBC (heh) content from their phone these days

>>25764803 oh no, not my BBC telly...

>>25764925 I'm almost 28, and live alone.

>>25764936 You probably owe them couple thousand Euros if for some reason you fell through the cracks so far.

>>25764946 Well, lucky me, I guess... I'll see how far I can go.

>>25764954 cool german vs wah wah soy german

TV Licence detector vans basicaly never existed and didn't have the ability to detect and unloicensed TV watcher. Also talking of loicenes, fuck NHK

>>25765008 >>25764889 These things were supposed to be a joke.

they need a license for katana swords too. i will never understand why the brits are okay with all these 1984 policies. our excuse is taht weve lost the war but what is the matter with britons??

>>25765060 They need a loicense for airsoft guns, and model firearms in general.

Zoomers don't even remember glorious GEZ. Deutschland has fallen.

>>25765008 >>25765053 No, in ye olden tyhmes they actually detected em radiation from the high voltage system of xrt tubes if they drove by it. They compared to a database and if there was a signal without a documented loicense they would get fined. Doesnt work in the agte of flat screens anymore though. Saw an interesting documentary of youtube about the history of these vans but i cant find it anymore damn.

>>25765108 *CRT obviously

imagine lying that you don't have a tv, but their mobile tv detector catches you having a tv

>>25765115 I dont think there is a "detector" anymore before FAT tvs had a signature you could pick up a specific frequency

>>25765108 THey never had more than a few vans and they were mostly just for publicity..

These TV loicense wankers are tiresome

>>25764803 i love free toilet paper

>>25765108 the vans were fake they couldnt detect shit

>>25767484 They weren't, I wish I could find that documentary

>>25764820 If you use them to watch live tv broadcasts or iplayer then yes, if not, then no. Same with actual TVs.

>>25767484 >>25765128 Ringway Manchester did an interesting video about them and how they worked. https://youtu.be/GCVps7N0YYE?si=obtnJHFBHeXhRWTl&utm_source=ZTQxO

The British tv license system is far better than ours, I really envy them. They can just not own a tv and don't have to pay. In Germany, the only way getting around paying is being unemployed. Also: >dear legal occupier In Germany they have access to the public register and get told your address immidiately if you move.

>>25769588 The thing with the TV licence is they have so little power to enforce it that they have to make the letters seem threatening in the hope you don't realise they're basically just begging letters. Foreigners see the letters online and think TV licencing and then think it's some Orwellian system with sweaping powers to go after you, which is of course exactly the image they want. But in reality you can just tell them to fuck off. Compare it to something like council tax, where you'll just get a nice polite letter if you don't pay. They don't need to try and intimidate you because they actually have the authority to get their money one way or the other. And if you try and be difficult then you'll just make it worse for yourself.

>>25769624 In Germany there are literally people in jail for not paying TV license.

>>25769624 in Germany we have a TV-Loicence-Gestapo

>>25764822 Only if you use BBC streaming services, but it's hard to prove you are not using them, theoretically the inspectors could come and go through your phone, computer, etc. Also look around for no hidden TVs, but even so it wouldn't be definite proof and they could keep sending those letters. They are basically a scam, it's best to just ignore them completely or just pay up if you are don't care about throwing away 12 pounds a month.

>>25764822 Only if you use BBC streaming services, but it's hard to prove you are not using them, theoretically the inspectors could come and go through your phone, computer, etc. Also look around for no hidden TVs, but even so it wouldn't be definite proof and they could keep sending those letters. They are basically a scam, it's best to just ignore them completely or just pay up if you don't care about throwing away 12 pounds a month.

>>25765008 >fuck NHK What's wrong with them?

>>25769648 >but it's hard to prove you are not using them You don't need to prove you aren't, they need to prove you are. >theoretically the inspectors could come and go through your phone, computer, etc. No they couldn't. >Also look around for no hidden TVs Only with a warrant, and they need evidence to get the warrant, and even of you have a TV, hidden or otherwise, they need to prove you're watching live TV or iplayer with it.

>>25769676 They could you are naïve and allows them, that's the point. Some boomers and foreigners probably do from time to time

>>25769683 >if you

>>25769676 Also I heard they make take pictures from the window to use as proof but it's probably bull

>>25767456 why don`t they lock up the tourette boy ? he could stay in a bollice-cage for being a tourette-boy

all my televisions are licensed, registered and insured. watching an unlicensed television ? couldnt be me