The ban was for suggesting Argentina is white. That was the hateful content.

I saw a meme about that movie where it said the peanuts was .69$ and he tricked him by paying only a quarter. Hilarious.

Define White. You see, there's a traditional anthropological 'Caucasian Race' - they all like to call themselves White. And there are quite a few 3rd world countries there. Starting with Semitic (Arab) countries. Then there is Europe. Again, there are some 3rd world tier countries there in geographical Europe. Then there is 'Catholic/Protestant Europe' - but it's starting getting ridiculous already. Well, there are, or at least were several failed countries among them too. Well, then there's Protestant Europe. Better. But still Finland, Latvia, Estonia they used to be broke. Not like poor but really really broke. Also exclusion of French and Swiss from "White" but adding Finns is already stupid. Well, whatever. Then there's Anglo-Saxon White - those are true White... Except there was infamous English rabble - violent, stupid, poor, uncouth. But then there's Anglo-Saxon gentry. Now we're talking. Yep. Except there are more mutts the higher on social ladder you climb as nobility used to marry all around Europe and beyond, and landed gentry loved to marry to lesser nobility. Are they really White with all that Greek, Turkish, Persian (Iranian), Russian (could be Tatar), Egyptian (could be Semitic) blood running through their veins. But finally there's Benjamin Franklin himself. The whitest of White. True English. True noble. Superior race. Ubermench. ... Except.. he was BALD - and baldness genes came from Middle East. Then who the fuck is White? I mean, I understand who is White and who isn't. I can see it. The problem is though there are lowlife people and failed societies among what I perceptive as White Race.

I'm guessing Slavs aren't white?

>>25762679 sorry posted in wrong fred

>>25762679 It depends. It's like Jews but the opposite. When it's good to be White Jews are White. When it's bad to be White Jews are PoC. While Slavs are: When it's good to be White Slavs are PoC. When it's bad to be White Slavs are White. Quite unfortunate really. They get no white privilege but suffer all the anti-white discrimination.

>>25762686 What do those people have in common that makes them different from the others? It's not a question really, I just want a clear formal definition.

>>25762679 you tell me

>>25762686 North Italians are swarthy and dark.

>>25762706 not as swarthy as a cigan

>>25762699 Wecterners all descend from the same group of people called Unetice. It's like a big family with the same paternal y haplogroup markers, same place of origin and same culture. The north of Unetice is what became Single Grave culture and eventually Germanics. The center is what became Tumulus and then Hallstadt culture(Celts). And the southern horizon(around Alps) is the birthplace of Italics(who later have migrated southwards)

>>25762724 Interesting but not correct: according what is written in Wikipedia Unetice is just Germanic people. No Gauls (Celts), no Italics. Btw, around Italian Alps during Roman Republic and Empire times lived Gallic tribes. No Germanic tribes till the late Empire when they invaded the peninsula from the north. Sorry, but you're trying to tie together several completely different pieces.

>>25762724 If you just trying to piece together tribes influenced by Roman culture then there should also be Greek and Spanish. If you simply piece Celts and Germans then Italy shouldn't be on the list while Ireland absolutely should (remember Ireland wasn't considered White; Italians started to be accepted to White earlier than Irish). If it's just Germanic tribes, then most of France shouldn't be White, as well as Scots should clearly be PoC. Yet Franklin told that Scots were for some reason White. While Irish weren't. It's all too strange really. My preferred definition is much simpler: people of Caucasian Race and native European origin sharing Western European culture. Then Czech while being Slavs are White. While Polish aren't. Something like that. What do you think?

Argentina is an injun+terrone country, but Belarus is a good example of a white third world country, even poorer than Argentina.

>>25762713 But more swarthy than a Romanian.

>>25762713 >not as swarthy as a cigan Actually...

>>25762782 Slavs aren't white, they're asians.

>>25762799 It's better that we call them white - losing to mongols is pathetic.

>>25762799 They originated from forests around modern Czechia. Is Czechia Asia? Also, there were no Slavs anywhere found in Asia until Russian Empire grew big enough to go past Turik tribes. First Slavs in Asia appeared just 500 years ago. What the fuck are you talking about really?

>>25762806 I am a Slav and I identify as a yellow asiatic mongol

>>25762806 They originated from the swamps of Belarus. Czechia had some Celtic.or Germanic tribe called the Boii at the time.

>>25762626 >argentina >white

>>25762809 Can't you see they're wearing white shirts?

Argentina is neither white nor third world, to he honest.

The whole B.Belt?

>>25762808 Don't know. Wiki says that its parts of Czechia, Poland and Belarus - somewhere in those thickets of primordial forests Slavs grew from fallen tree trunks like moss. Or something like that. I don't remember all the details.

>>25762806 >Is Czechia Asia? Asia starts at the Berlin wall. Also your asiatic butthurt shows you're slavic. Slavic culture, racial soul, mythology, etc. is fully asiatic. The physognomy is pseudo-white, a mimicy like with jews. Like jews, the slav is easy to distinguish from whites, for example by skin tone and hair structure.

>>25762837 I agree with some of your points but Slavic mythology and culture could be substituted to the Nordic ones and if you changed the names of the gods it would be a 1:1 match

Like how you can tell apart a Slav in the crowd thats generally true but the part about beliefs and culture is false

>>25762843 Not at all. Was it forbidden to utter Odin's name like it was with Dajbog among the South Slavs? No, because that's a typical asiatic belief, cf. YHWH. Was the symbol of the thunder god Perun the axe or the hammer? The axe, like in asiatic deities, not the hammer, like with Thor. Add to that stuff like the obsession with ritual purity, which is found all over Asia from islam to shintoism, but not in western beliefs, and the picture becomes clear.

>>25762746 >Btw, around Italian Alps during Roman Republic and Empire times lived Gallic tribes. No Germanic tribes till the late Empire when they invaded the peninsula from the north. Nigger, I’m talking about the Bronze Age >according what is written in Wikipedia Ahh, never mind

>>25762799 Does it make Germans asian too? Because you know, Germans are partially Slavic. And I’m talking not only about Eastern Germany, west and south Germany are also SLAVED.COM

>>25762858 Perun was represented with both an axe and a hammer. Ritual purity? Are you trolling me right now? Summer solstice was literally the night of sex and the rituals were all about sex and offerings >Dajbog in south slavs That's not even a valid point, it's not like every Nordic man praised the same Thor, during early European civilization times gods differed in every village and had different attributes. I think you should educate yourself on how early cultures portrayed literally everything as a manifestation of some god It happened with the Greeks too, in one village Athena was a whore in other she was a virgin, only after homer it became homogeneous

>>25762868 You wish. Ossis are slavs - again, Asia starts at the Berlin wall. Bavaria has some slight slavic admixture due to immigration, same for the Ruhrpott area. Other than that, slavs are rare in Germany.

>>25762875 Go to vahaduo and test your countrymen (like I already did). You can bullshit whomever you want, but not me. But who knows, maybe you are really that clueless…

Just checked some dates. >The Únětice culture.. dated roughly to about 2300–1600 BC >Trzciniec culture is an Early and Middle Bronze Age 2400-1300 BC The first are Germanic. The second are Balto-Slavic (yep, Balts have the same roots which is funny - you know Balts love counting themselves as White while Slavic as PoC while they both belong to the same race) >>25762875 Hey, idiot, Slavs lived beside Germans as long as Germans lived in Europe. You're so fucking stupid - you're clearly not a German. You're some kind of a mutt. You better stop talking about European history and origin of European people and tribes.

The actual answer is West Virginia However inbred, and underdeveloped, and so on, it's not a violent place.

>>25762626 bruh

>>25762892 Trzciniec were not Slavs or Balts. Autasomally they are neither. They were somewhat similar to Germanics(because partially Corded Ware but this is not the only thing which makes Germanics the way they are) but they lacked the amount of Balto-Slavic genetic “drift” which characterises Balts. To make things really simple for many bernds who cite wikipedia instead of actual knowledge: there was an Old Europe, inhabited by the settlers from Anatolia, who have migrated there 7-8k years ago and mixed with local hunters(who were not that different actually, they lived as their neighbours in the Balkans during the last Glacial Maximum). If we compare them to the modern populations, those “Old Europeans” were the closest to Sardinians. Meds basically. Then they got enriched by the Corded Ware - Yamnaya like rapefugees from the Pontic Caspian steppe. They lived side by side for a few centuries but eventually started to racemix as Steppe niggers started to take med women as wifes(apparently cucking their husbands since they haven’t left a genetic legacy). There is a direct continuation for wecterners - Early Corded Ware(70% steppe) -> Bell Beaker(50-60% steppe) -> Unetice. Unetice WERE NOT Germanic since Germanics have originated in Scandinavia later in the Nordic Bronze Age culture, but they are predominantly descend from Unetice culturally and partially genetically. I’m not gonna elaborate on the I1 haplogroup and the East Scandinavian cluster since it would be too much. Celts were very similar to Germanics because they also come from the Unetice, but they lived more southern and had less steppe and more farmer admixture. But I’m only talking about the origins here. Of course what we know about Celts and their cultural traits came later, in the late Tumulus and Halstatt. Those people started to mine salt in Salzburg and became very rich and influential by doing so. urg and became very rich and prosperous

Don’t bother with the last sentence, I’m typing from my phone and didn’t notice it

>>25763119 Man you're mixing a lot there. You're trying to tell that a whole huge space of Europe was inhabited by only one ethnic group - that's unrealistic for such primitive society: every culture had its own habitat they were accustomed to. Then you also claim that there was a lot of raping but while Neanderthal genes can be found in Europeans Sardinian genes can't be found in Germanic, Slavic, or Baltic. That's a contradiction. Finally, you claim that humans of totally unrelated to people speaking Proto-Balto-Slavic managed to loan the language without including ANY TRACE of they own - not Prot-Balto-Slavic language. There's no such cases in linguistic. Even when to different tribes live across mountains linguists can easily find cross influence. What you believe then is that the newcomers didn't have any language at all. The problem with that is that language is instinctual trait: when a couple of deaf kids isolated from anyone lived together they naturally developed a sign language on their own. All humans develop language. Lack of linguistic evidences that Proto-Balto-Slavic speakers were different people that modern Slavic and Baltic proves that modern Slavic and Baltic are the direct descendants of PBS people. You are trying to manipulate data to paint a world you want to imagine. I know such people. There are people who reject Darwin's theory. There are also people who reject African origin of Homo Sapiens. I know when I hear such people.

>>25763282 What you've written sounds like a paragraph created by an AI trained on reddit data

>>25762809 They all claim to be shitalian (and they are correct)

Oh, come on. The Brits were still drinking poo water and the French were still dumping poo onto the streets a century ago. Modern civilization is still recent, and agrarian societies are industrializing. Give them time, you spoiled lil white boy.

>>25762699 The term "white" was created to distinguish European colonisers from natives and nigger slaves. Therefore whites are Europeans who had colonies, namely: - Brits - French - Spaniards - Portuguese - Belgians - Dutch - Germans Other Europeans such as slavs and shitalians are not white.

Fuck terminally online Iranians, Mexicans, Indians. Don't your mouths get tired of deep-throating right-wing American talking points? I want to fuck your mouth.

On second thought, I don't even want agrarian societies to industrialize or commercialize. 😑 I like child sex.

Don't sell your soul to wealth. Love your people and your children. Have sex with kids.

>>25763399 Poccnr had a colony - Alaska. But if we really think about it, the whole Siberia is sort of a colony

Child sex.

Thanks to modern technology that we have child porn, though. 😳

>>25763428 Also, that Twitter user probably didn't know this, but his framing of third-worldism aligned with a pro-corporate, pro-rat race grift. It's just a shallow consumeristic soy boy mindset with a pro-whiteness aesthetic. That's why I don't use X. My thinking skills are too advanced to surround myself with such low-tier NPCs.

>>25763400 All those are pro russian though. You mean alt right talking points.

>>25763714 Tbh, I don't know anything.

>>25762746 >>25762767 >Btw, around Italian Alps during Roman Republic and Empire times lived Gallic tribes. Northern Italy, the Alps and the north of it are originally Celtic >If you just trying to piece together tribes influenced by Roman culture It is the reverse, the Romans were influenced by Celtic culture. >If you simply piece Celts and Germans They are obvious related and one sublimated into the other. > Italy shouldn't be on the list Italy, the north off. It wasn't a thing as "Italy" didn't exist and even in Roman times people would wonder if you are right in the head. Southern Italy was Greek (and Punic) and most of central Italy by culturally very distinct tribes and cultures like the Etrurians. >while Ireland absolutely should Ireland is "Celtic" as Brazil is "Roman", secondary cultural. The British islands were colonized by Celts that brought their central European culture there. >Then Czech while being Slavs are White. They are a Germanized bastard race.

Argentina es blanco

wh*te people will cease to exist in 8 years and its a good thing.

>>25762806 >>25762799 > Slavs > originated from forests around modern Czechia. No >Is Czechia Asia? Are Gypsies Asian?

>>25762892 >Hey, idiot, Slavs lived beside Germans as long as Germans lived in Europe. "Slavs" only appear in Europe during the early middle ages, that are the facts.

>>25763119 >Unetice WERE NOT Germanic since Germanics have originated in Scandinavia Germanics never orginated from Scandinavia. That is some pre-WW1 bullshit. Germanics originated from central-eastern Europe and settled, colonized in Scandinavia. >>25763903 There is no economic, agricultural base for a people to grow there, it is too barren and has a too limited grow period. This is also evident by Scandi genetic make up.

Argentina used to be white, it has decayed a ton but it's still better than basically any other latin american cunt which is why I believe people cling to what they were in the past

*is a third world country