>lithuanian-president-proposes literally who audrius?

>lithuanian AHAHAHAHA

That means Germany will be financing Ukraine for the next 30 years just like Poland. You sure you can afford such luxuries, Germany? Another Poland? Fugg.

Big if true...

>>25658486 as oposed to fund mulsims in their own country?

>>25658430 Nice, based

fuck off were full unless it is necessary to do economic takeover than very yes

>>25658430 >Ukraine will join the EU on January 1, 2030. Hohols really believe that.

>>25658505 Small if false...

>>25658430 2030 is no urine left

>>25658612 without hohols poland will have to import jeets and pakis like PiS already did before war

>>25658606 In addition to.

>>25658634 they can't pay for both.

>>25658640 So you think they're going to raus the millions of migrants already there breeding like rabbits? You think they're going to stop saying "refugees welcome" and enforce their border after the floodgates have already been turned on? I doubt it. Now they take in muslims to their land and will support Ukraine from afar as well. Of course its not sustainable, but they're not shutting the door on rampant migration.

>>25658648 in that case having another xenophobic 20-30 million eastern european country in union will make wonders. Poland protects their borders grom browns and so are baltics.

This country had enough degeneracy in last 300 years, we don't need even more of this

>>25658664 The browns in case you haven't noticed don't come from that direction and still manage to get in. Its nice to have poland as protection, don't get me wrong. But I don't think Germany can afford such settis is all I'm suggesting.

>>25658670 union policies are forged by member states, the more chud states in union the better for native europeans. also there are millions of hohols already in europe and schengen zone will actually help them to go back. This is pretty evident if you look at countries like bosnia, serbia and albania where diasporas can't return because they fear they will not be able to go back to wect if needed.

>>25658678 Again my concern here is cost to build up Ukraine, which comes from net contributors to EU, primarily Germany. Yes, having more border from the Golden Horde is good, sending Ukrainians back would be good, but at what price? The price of many, many Euromarks.

>>25658486 I'd prefer this option, unironically. Before 2014 putler had been feeding their corrupted elites with money, so it's time for someone else.

>>25658683 Everyone should prefer this options except net contributors to EU. Sucks to be them

>>25658681 Good investitions will be good for the union economy. Some existing industries in ukraine would benefit EU (neon production in Odessa). the only problem is possible corruption.

>>25658430 Well, what's left of it anyway.

Why wect needs balts in EU?

>>25658781 To tell them the truth. We told those petuhs since 2004 what Russians are. They didnt believe. now they do