Do you think cavemen had buddies?

>>25647127 I wonder what the first annoying conversation went like. Imagine the fist time some caveman just rambled on to another about how cool his rock was or how good of a hunter he is.

>>25647137 You know it definitely happened back then because we still do it today

>>25647144 But one day it was the first. This novel means of information conveyance turned sour. Now this mind-bending symbolic tool turned to like "God, Og wish this guy shut up already, me never leaving cave again!" "me live in society!"

>>25647158 It's really funny to think about the first cavemen who named things "Oh what a beautiful... tree! Oh what a nice blue... water!"

They probably just bludgeoned the first women to death when they got annoying, and/or raped them, but it wasn't really rape, just cavesex. There were no cavecels.

>>25647200 It was centuries of badly describing things and debating on what to call them. >"The thing, you know, the big thing come out of ground with the green everywhere" <"what fuck is green?" and people who couldn't settle just broke into factions and that's why we have countries

>>25647219 I really hate those Russian bastards because once in a time they called green as purple instead, green is green and not purple

>>25647237 Exactly. This is my new theory of human population schism; They didn't develop different languages based on geographical isolation, rather they isolated themselves geographically because they couldn't stop bickering about words. Its too bad we can't glean insights by studying primitive human social structures that abound today. We're not allowed to say these people are a window into the past.

>>25647262 Somewhere in time it had to convex because we say that green is green today and not purple, there is one word that won instead of another, why is that tho?