Yes, same for maxon.

Based Trump, Acrobat is the most retarded piece of software ever

>45 minutes with help from IT to combine a fucking pdf without a $1000/month subscription Why were people complaining again about Musk firing government employees?

come to pdf24 it's so fecking good

Why are PDF's so pain in the ass to edit without Acrobat?

>>25636755 and the source of so many browser vulnerabilities

>>25636786 Adobe designed PDFs to be that way.

>>25636786 Because then it's easier to justify paying money to the adobe jews.

>>25636762 The system before worked, and now adapting to a new software or finding one means retraining. Most government employees are midwits to halfwits so think of that as you will. Also that she's complaining means she's one of the few who attempt to work at her workplace.

>>25636786 because drumf is bad, okay, he is just bad

>>25636786 PDFs are not supposed to be edited, it's like editing an executable. They are a pain to edit with Acrobat as well.

>get liberated from the need to have a rootkit installed so you can use your always online piece piece of cloud kikeware that exists only to solve the problem it artificially created <cry about it I hate normgroids

>>25636796 I got Baldurs Gate 3 to run on Win 7 by editing its .exe

>>25636796 today I had to sign some shit received from HR, and they sent me a .docx, I could't check checkboxes there nor add my signature, so I had to convert it to pdf in word and then edited it in acrobat

>>25636794 They should be given pickaxes to drill baby drill

I made the mistake of installing creative cloud at work and it hogs 100% of my CPU out of nowhere and is very hard to uninstall

>>25637921 It just means whatever whores work in your HR don't know how to create PDF forms.

You shouldn't be combining PDFs in the first place. 99% of times PDFs just contain a bunch of jpegs. You can extract those with command line tools and stop wasting time.

Last time I checked you could buy a perpetual license but it was hidden. There were two options, around $300 or $600.

>>25636796 No, it's not. It's like editing the worst vector graphic format ever made. And the vector graphic isn't descriptive but created using a scripting language.

PDF is one of those -make problem -offer solution by Adobe

>>25636743 Actually, everything adobe does is for free.

>>25637921 No, you didn't have to. Since it can't be converted back, you could have just as well converted it to png and filled it out with any image editor without adobe. I literally signed a contract by converting a pdf to png and filling filling it out with my graphics tablet.

>>25637921 How do you have issues filling a form in a fucking text editor?

>>25638039 Most secure german protocol.

>>25638088 There is nothing secure about PDF. It just contains vector and image data glued together by a disgusting scripting language.

first they came for the politico subscriptions, then they came for adobe. when will you speak up?

>editing pdfs lmao he should get fired

>>25638221 WhumpleGirl is probably a woman.

>>25638258 Woman (male)

>>25638269 Woman (35f)

Just think what her 45 minutes of learning cost vs the cost of the subscription. It was probably a good investment.

*Learning was