I don't know anymore.

>Guatemala He was a big deal in Mexico for some reason. Was the the only white person you guys saw at that time or something?

>He seethed when he visited Thomas Jefferson's home and saw many slaves, claiming all humans come from a common origin What a faggit

Apparently Jefferson was a bitch. Were this soy redditing near Jackson that'd be the end of his story

I think it's hilarius that it was still possible in 19th century to travel around the world and discover a ton of species and places that nobody knew about. Anyways, in Germany he is mostly viewed as the weird bother of the more famous Wilhelm von Humboldt.

We may share the same origin, but not the same destination.

Out of Africa theory is still a theory, there also skeletons even older than what they found in Africa considered 'anatomically human', it really depends on what you believe. There is however very old literature ascertaining to human beings originating in the Middle East, so perhaps, that is might be worth considering?

Out of Africa theory is still a theory, there also skeletons even older than what they found in Africa considered 'anatomically human', it really depends on what you believe. There is however very old literature ascertaining to human beings originating in the Middle East, so perhaps, that might be worth considering?

slaves are biblical

>>25627757 Is that right? And people in Congress would discuss this thing when the South owned slaves prior the Civil War.

>>25627755 >Out of Africa theory is still a theory What else would it be? >it really depends on what you believe No, it does not.

Personally I don't agree with slavery but I don't think humans are free whatsoever in any way either, either to a slaveholder, a corporation, or the State, or to God or Nature, or whatever other constraint or entity.

>>25627765 Yessss it does there are conflicting scientific literatures out there about this thing, it's not an agreed upon consensus. Science isn't about that anyway, it's about establishing truth.

>>25627757 Because Jews love them.

>>25627760 Yeah, but I don’t know the context. From what I read it’s usually God being like such is life.

>>25627765 Uneducated brainlet, fuck off forever.

>>25627765 If we have to be brutally honest about humanity's past, we know nothing about it still, it's still very much conjecture.

>>25627775 No believe me I read up on this as much as you have, and you're no specialist in this either, so I don't see how you could claim I'm a brainlet otherwise

>>25627755 It just isn't. Homo sapiens sapiens are known to have emerged in Ethiopia approximately 200k years ago. The oldest known skeleton of this subspecies was found there. Every other anatomically modern human skeleton or remains you have ever heard of which is older are not homo sapiens sapiens which is what we are. They may be homo sapiens neanderthals or denisovans or something else. It's simply not a preference of belief. You have to invent a fiction to believe in to think that our current subspecies emerged from a location that isn't Ethiopia or central-eastern Africa.

>>25627775 Do you have a phD or doctorate in archaeology or anthropology? No? Thought so, so maybe you should fuck off Germanyboy.

>>25627781 >>25627786 Show me the evidence of homo sapiens sapiens skeleton remains you have seen which is older than 200k years and was found somewhere else other than the horn of Africa. I'll wait and keep this thread bumped if you need.

>>25627783 Ok are you saying from the position of somebody who actually knows about this or are you saying this as somebody who reads about this?

>>25627776 We know the first known hominids developed around Greece, graecopithecus freybergi. That one's older than African fossils.

>>25627791 Share the evidence.

>>25627790 >>25627793 We're talking about things we don't know about as amateurs by the way.. It is an unproductive conversation from the start if we continue with this. You should both fuck off to be frank.

>>25627795 Evidence status?

>>25627797 Why don't you fuck off if you're an amateur.

> It's true because I say so > so now fuck off What a fucking retard. He can't provide any evidence because he's just talking out of fat arse.

>>25627800 As I said before actually knowing about this and reading about this are two different things, you're NOT an expert if you just read about this. You can go fuck off now, sirrah.

> reeeeeeeee stop calling me out Invented fictions are fun. They are not science.

>>25627790 >Show me the evidence of homo sapiens sapiens . Dude, you don't read any newspapers for how long now?

>>25627804 You don't know what science is, you've never done it in any serious capacity. Where is your work, where is your credentials even, where is your anything? Dude just fuck off, you're a faggot on some imageboard who knows nothing better than anyone else here.

>>25627800 >What a fucking retard. He can't provide any evidence because he's just talking out of fat arse. This approach amy work on 4chan or reddit, but no here. People here are more educated and know you are bullshitting.

>>25627804 Don't assume anything from news articles or anything you read, please, it's ridiculous if you know nothing about what you're reading. You're just a faggot.

>>25627806 >skeleton remains That's not what we're discussing. It's not just any old skeleton. We're talking about skeleton remains of homo sapiens sapiens and not any other homo sapiens skeletons. The oldest ever are in Ethiopia. >>25627807 Post the evidence and stop screeching.

>>25627812 Post evidence of older homo sapiens sapiens skeletons found elsewhere then.

>>25627800 >>25627817

>>25627820 >humans >hominins Not specifically homo sapiens sapiens. Try again.

I'm off to work. I'm sure the collective IQ of a retarded fatmaster and some illiterate little Hitlerboys can figure this out eventually though. Good work boys.

>>25627824 >>25627826 SO you#re running away while not waiting for a response after moving the goalposts from "human remains older than 200k but not Horn of Africa" to "sapiens sapiens"? Classy.

>>25627817 Anyone can post "evidence", what matters is if it means something, if it can be proved 100%. Archaeology and anthropology is still very much guesswork, they don't have much evidence. I remember being told that all the bones of super ancient remains are very limited. There's really not much to go on.