I bet it will be something gay.

I might create a new Rosetta stone, perhaps in a object–subject–verb word order, and using only 5 syllables, and a syllabary format, and seemingly no recursion. Imagine the chaos in the linguistic world, nerds will be at each other's throats :D

>>25622524 We live in an interesting time when it's never been more difficult to make a convincing hoax due to forensic technology being very advanced, while on the other hand it's never been easier to fool more people with a hoax due to social media. The real challenge therefore is to either make a hoax so good that it tricks people who actually understand the subject, or to see what is the crappiest, most low-effort hoax you can pull off while fooling the highest amount of uninformed people.

soylogists found some stone labyrinth here and claimed it was from the stonage Until some old dude stepped forward and said he and some other kids made it 50 years ago

>>25622595 Lel

Just use AI to generate conspiracy slop bro. It would be even easier

The last successful viral hoax was probably that monolith story. But it seems like a lot of effort just to make mad all. It's way easier to just hoax some UFO pictures or smth and people will always reference them.

>>25622578 very intelligent answer. I guess the first option would be the most stimulating for me, fooling a ton of scientists into believing that an unbelievable scientific breakthrough happened

>>25622602 but I want to do something grandiose, not just muddy the waters of knowledge

>>25622626 what was it even for ?

>>25622673 its basically just a rip-off of 2001