The uploader chooses the thumbnail

How does this thumbnail endanger the heckin' kids? You're more deranged than an American puritan, if you think this is le problematic.

>>25622353 I'm just pointing out the blatant virtue signaling >YouTube has a ZERO TOLERANCE policy for pedophiles, they're literally Hitler! Sexualizing le minors is strictly forbidden! >Oh also here's some cunny cameltoe just for you :-)

>>25622393 If you see something sexual in little girls dancing, maybe you're the pedo.

>>25622418 Obviously I am, my point is that YouTube doesn't really care about "protecting children" or whatever, all they care about is maximizing engagement by any means necessary, including flooding your feed with videos that are obviously geared towards the "pedo gaze". If they actually cared about keeping muh pedos off the platform you'd think they'd specifically tailor their algorithm to discourage people who specifically use it for cunny, but evidently not.

>>25622276 I'm pretty sure YouTube autoselects it for videos like these, otherwise there's a suspiciously high amount of third worlders who are basically e-pimping their kids for clicks

but, if you say some "criminal should get the rope" in the comments, you get a 24 hour ban

>>25622435 Doesn't youtube have that most watched timestamp feature where you can see where people pause or rewind the video? Maybe they use that for thumbnails.

is there a way to DM uploader and ask why he chose that particular moment as thumbnail? no judgement, just for information purposes only

>>25622265 how exactly is this harmful to children?

>>25622471 Ah, fair point, but still

Also YouTube enstated that COPPA policy a few years ago, where you aren't allowed to comment on anything featuring or even remotely related to children, but they seemed to have rolled back on that a little. Now you can see good old "buy her XXL pampers 😍😍😍" comments on family vlog channels

YouTube more like jewtube

😲

Hot in the biscuit

youtube has so much sexy content even with all the censorhip imagine without

>>25622981 Without censorship it would just become a cp site. As would every website.

>>25622994 SUCK PAPA'S DICK CHALLENGE (gone wrong)

>>25623008 Social experiment in the hood (GONE SEXUAL)