Canada is a British colony, and gets appointed general-governors

What are you going to do about it faggot? Shitpost on KC?

It's all a controlled theatre, and nothing you do matters, I've been trying to tell people this but they want to believe that politics is real

The party had an election you retard

Like guys, these elites really are conspiring against you and really don't care about you Trump was on the Epstein Flight list and went to WEF meetings like this is just getting very silly that you still think all of this, was for your benefit the voter

>>25611011 nurse, get the straps.

>>25611016 uh oh, are you gonna MAID him?

>>25611011 And what did you do retard? Shitposted on KC? Bravo 👏👏👏 You really enlightened us bravo 🎉

Not every country shares the same government system as yours. Canada elects its parliament and parliament decides what happens. You're confused because you're equating Prime Minister to your President and find it absurd that they can have new ones without an election. They're not the same thing and it isn't a translation error. Canada, as with other countries formerly part of the British Empire, use the Westminster parliamentary system which we forged since the civil war. Our civil war, not yours. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system It is definitely odd that the democratically elected Liberal party in the Commons will not actually have Carney there to deliver speeches and attend debates. He will lead them like a phantom in the back of their minds I suppose until he wins a riding. Altogether this entire process is still democratic. The last Canadian election gave the Liberal party control over the Commons and they can organise themselves and re-arrange themselves as needs must.

>>25611208 but shouldn't the PM be elected from the MPs crowd? in this way he'd be voted as an MP

>>25610971 He can still win

>>25611232 no here social democrats made a random instagram whore the PM and the world loved it

>>25611232 IMO yes. Political parties used to have different tiers of electors within their own ranks. Party political leaders used to only be elected from the 'selectorate' if you will of sitting MPs. For your interest we have a somewhat related example in the last Scottish Conservative Prime Minister if you don't count David Cameron's ancestry. Home inherited his peerage from his line and sat in the Lords. He was selected by the ruling Tory party to lead them after Macmillan and had to somehow leave the Lords (upper house) and enter the Commons (lower house). I'm not sure how he did it, I'm sure there are some British constitution geeks who could explain, but we did have a period of about 3 weeks in the 1960s where the British prime minister wasn't actually a member of parliament at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alec_Douglas-Home#Prime_Minister_(1963%E2%80%931964)

>>25611208 The funny thing is that you literally describe an oligarchy and call it democratic

>>25611303 The alternative is direct democracy but there's no large scale examples.

>>25611303 Wouldn't any type of government where electors choose someone to represent them be that? How do you propose to democratically govern 350M people in your cunt without every single person voting and debating every piece of legislation all the time?

>>25611343 >How do you propose to democratically govern 350M people in your cunt without every single person voting and debating every piece of legislation all the time? AI?

>>25611340 >>25611343 I'm not going to be the guy who calls a representative republic a democracy. But you have to admit it is far closer to one than a parliamentary system.

>>25611379 Did you like that book? I've been meaning to try political fiction.

>>25611411 It probably is but that doesn't make it better. I'm not a big fan of constitutional barriers hampering the power of government. The best constitutional rule we have is arguably the most powerful one: No new parliament can ever be impeded by an old one. I think it's a bit weird how other countries have political support for one policy or another but get blocked because of an old law or either the president and the parliament don't agree or judges get involved. It's all just a bit bizarre. Here if the Commons agrees, then there's a check from the Lords who suggest amendments and send it back to the Commons up to 3x (literally called ping-pong btw), and then it becomes law. Westminster style governments probably have the most efficient government in terms of speed of delivery with a somewhat democratic base.

>>25611303 "who's the smartest person on the US? - a tourist"

>>25610971 Trudouche was already a WEF puppet klaus has openly stated that around 80% of the canadian government are his young leaders that goes for the entirety of european governments too

>>25611208 >yeah we literally have a Chinese-tier system but hey, it's heckin valid and democratic just because The definition of wectern democracy needs to be re-evaluated

>>25611502 What countries actually need is an elected dictatorship with unlimited powers for 5 years, that can't be removed or restrained in any way. You do believe in democracy, don't you!!

>>25610985 If Canada is a British colony then why don't its people look British?

Klaus Schwab is now leading the free world against silicon valley oligarchy. What a time to be alive.

>>25610971 Trump is a dicatator, was never elected by the people, but by some shady deep-state "Electoral College" How is that even possible!?!?!?!?!?