Want to see more threads and images? Ask Bernd!
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:22:16 GMT No. 25607622 [Kohl] [Report thread]
curry rape.mp4
868.53 kB, 360x360
Good day bloody bastards
Total posts: 5, files: 2 (Drowned at Tue, 11 Mar 2025 07:09:34 GMT)
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:29:09 GMT No. 25607664 >>25607846
ClipboardImage-1741602531.png
54.24 kB, 1200x817
Air India 777 returns to Chicago over clogged toilets This incident happened on March 5, 2025, and involves Air India flight AI126, scheduled to operate from Chicago (ORD) to Delhi (DEL). The flight was operated by a 15-year-old Boeing 777-300ER with the registration code VT-ALQ. The flight took off from O’Hare Airport on schedule, at 11:24AM, and began its roughly 14-hour journey to India. The jet flew out over Canada, the Labrador Sea, and Greenland, and then continued its Atlantic crossing. However, over four hours after departure, the jet made a 180-degree turn, and headed back toward Chicago. That was quite a long journey, and the plane ended up landing there at 9:08PM, after a flight time of 9hr44min. That’s right, the plane flew for nearly 10 hours, only to end up back where it started. So, what was the reason the plane returned to its origin? According to the airline, it was due to “technical reasons.” However, according to passengers, it was because the toilets onboard were clogged, and by the time the plane was passing Greenland, only one of the aircraft’s 12 toilets was working. That’s a rough reason for a diversion, and one certainly wonders why returning to the origin was the best option in this case, especially since it required roughly five hours of backtracking. Wouldn’t it have made sense to divert to a closer airport still on the way to India, rather than returning to an outstation? Or was the concern that the crew would time out at that point, and then passengers would be stranded in a foreign country? My first thought is that it seems like it could’ve made sense to divert to London, which is a big station for Air India, and has plenty of flights that passengers could be rebooked on. However, the plane would’ve arrived while the airport’s curfew is in effect. For what it’s worth, the aircraft ended up remaining on the ground in Chicago until 2PM on March 7, so it took nearly two days until the plane could reenter service.
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:30:25 GMT No. 25607673
Fookin wakner
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:12:20 GMT No. 25607846
>>25607664 i don t get it. march 5, 2025 - airports curfew is in effect in london? but it was an emergency.
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:23:53 GMT No. 25607901
Bloody fucking
Bernd Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:59:49 GMT No. 25608036
GlXgHSTbwAAhta1.jpg
80.03 kB, 470x652
Thread interest score: 1.2 Thread size: 39.81 kB