france and the uk have nukes nothing will happen ever

>>25600862 You can't even launch your nukes without US approval. Only France can.

>>25600868 wrong

Europe can't into arms production, arms production is very bad for ecology and refugees.

They been eating shart with a spoon since ww2 and now they notice the taste ?!?!

>>25600862 >last nuclear test: 34 years ago You probably don't have nukes already

I'm confused with this sentiment. Is the US now refusing to supply these countries? What happened?

Saying that during Bidler's term would be a political suicide and you'd be branded a russian asset. EUrangutangs are simply retarded, next time some demonrat wins in USA they'll switch the narrative overnight.

>>25600883 Orange man bad, senile man good. Nothing more.

>>25600883 Europeans only start caring about a thing when the press and propaganda arm of the government tells them to

>>25600883 >Is the US now refusing to supply these countries? No, they still have cards. But what will happen when they will be out of cards?

>>25600893 Depends on the card game pathetic thirdie

>>25600893 well if they spend 2% gdp on defense then US will happily honour NATO treaty.

>>25600887 >Saying that during Bidler's term would be a political suicide and you'd be branded a russian asset. Totally wrong. France almost never buy American military stuff. It's up to others Euro to believe that MAGA guys will never be reelected and rely on the USA.

>>25600915 France was always like that, you left the NATO at one time

>>25600899 America being ruled by old man with giant ego and small pecker, not like you can trust such people at all

>>25600921 We never fully left NATO, only the integrated military command. And Euro can change course anyway.

Imagine Switzerland having to ask the USA for permission to attack Germany, or else its F-35 will not be able to take off. Cucked to the maximum.

>>25600862 You will probably have a war between yourselves, again, before anything.

>>25600953 Imagine that the americans have the ability to remotely turn off Britains nukes

>>25600921 France didn't change much as a government since XIX century. And one thing they dor right - they keep their competence in technologies that might be extremely important. When covid broke out and pidorashkas were marketing their Zpootnik vaccine, putin was calling Macron asking to produce the volumes of the vaccine because pidorashkas could only fool thirdworlders and couldn't actually deliver shit, because poccnrs didn't sustain these pesky egghead biologists, they had no production line for this kind of event. France had. France didn't listen to German squealing about dropping nuclear power. Now German energy is in shit. France is not. France kept its nuclear weapons program and French official warned Ukrainians that they will be tricked with the Budapest memorandum. France was the only European nation that didn't scuttle its army in this 30-year period of relative calm. Same with the French weapons production, engineering for airspace, etc. Those were right decisions after all.

>>25600868 true, true

>>25600882 warmonger subhuman

>>25600882 probably replaced the warheads and filled with sand

>>25600882 This. They are probably all dried up like Angelika's '''vagina'''

>>25600883 usa can disable systems even if you are not fighting against usa or their allies

>>25600883 American and Israeli military equipment can be shutdown remotely. Actually, Europe should use hoplites, catapults and musket infantry instead that are completely free from Jewish backdoors.

>>25600883 Trump has shown he has a kill switch for US system, which he will use if they're used against Russia.

>>25600887 Biden didn't betray NATO though. Trump did. >Situation changes >Behavior is adjusted

>>25600899 USA gave security gurantees to Ukraine and Afghanistan and look where we are now. It's not the first time either, just look at the aftermath of Yalta. The US could have stopped the USSR occupation of eastern Europe because lend-lease was still in effect, yet they chose not to out of subservience to Russia.

>>25600974 That's why France is the most powerful EU country even though it has an absolutely shit economy and is one bad week away from a civil war.

>>25601115 Source?

>>25600883 >Is the US now refusing to supply these countries? Everybody is worried there are backdoors and one day the F-35's will simply not take off against Russia because someone flips the switch in Washington

>>25601154 Read the news? Ukraine's US equipment was turned off.

The funny thing is that they wanted energy independence and got dependent to the us only at 3 times the price :D

Butthurtbelters in searches of the new master ass they can lick. LMAO Nobody help you, piggies.

>>25601456 >svynya_pospishaet_na_zakhyst_amerikanskogo_gospodarya.png

>>25601138 French civil war meme is as old as KC int. Btw I read burger troops are moving from Germany to Hungary. Time to rearm krauts. >>25601436 >>25601456 We will spread nuclear energy in Europe, we will weaponized Europe and you will be unhappy.

>>25601500 >Time to rearm krauts. seeing a frenchman write this is hilarious nothing bad can come from German re-armament, least of all for france btw, who owns Alsace Lorraine?

>>25601516 >Alsace Lorraine? Oi mate, are you a time traveler from 19th century by a chance?

>>25601516 You will learn more Russian words soon, bistrocuck.

Surrender monkeys should be glassed preemptively .

>>25600862 How many nukes you have?

>>25600896 Well, if you play uno you actually win.

>>25601559 when Anglos and Russians unite, no one can stop us

>>25601572 the americans have the power to switch our nukes off

>>25600854 It's nice to judge it from nowadays' perspective, but Europe is to blame for that too. A fren of mine is a mid level diplomat and last year he had a conversation with his French counterpart, which went kinda like this >wtf polacks, why are you buying American and Korean arms? where's your European solidarity?? >where was your solidarity, when we asked to be included in the European tank program and got denied? >uhhh, listen, you could've at least buy European tanks, mkay? >well, do you have 500 tanks available from next year for the war which might start in three years? >we... we.... [impotent French screeching]

>>25601593 Damn, it's even more humiliating than Budapest memorandum

>>25601117 USA only betrayed Russia with not disbanding nato after collapse of USSR.

>>25601128 Eastern europe is now occupied by amerishart puppet regimes but it is a Russian clay.

>>25601138 Good joge, surrender monkeys already got kicked out from africa and nobody takes serious macrons babbling.

>>25601559 >>25601591 What we are seeing is much more similar to the Crimean war. A coalition of European powers allied with Turkey to remove Russian expensionism. And Russia lost. >>25601600 You bought American aicrafts instead of Rafale. I hope they will work if shit hits the fan.

>>25601603 The USA has cucked us I demand my government undoes this disgrace and gives us a truly independent nuclear arsenal, before I am willing to join the Royal Armed Forces this is my request

>>25601674 Until England has an independent nuclear arsenal, I REFUSE to fight.

>>25601674 your empire is gone ladm8, we have the cards now

>>25601674 Join the French Foreign Legion, it will protect Britain against the USA.

>>25601645 >surrendermonkeys still coping with Crimean war Lmao

>>25601696 >>25601692 GIVE ME NUKES OR GIVE ME DEATH

>>25601696 I rate the french but imma be real with you, I aint learning french lol If the FFL wants to start issuing commands in English then we can talk

>>25601696 Yeah, it did so well in africa, lmao. I like that Russia kicked you out and prevented surrender monkeys expansionism and neocolonialism.

>>25601708 spoken like a wog

>>25601692 give us our nukes NOW!

>>25601714 its true the burden of proof is on you

>>25601714 please prove me wrong please, i sincerely want you to prove me wrong

>>25601706 FFL forces their conscripts to take french language lessons, they're not gonna speak english to you

>>25600862 The UK nuclear missiles are Lockheed-Martin and your subs fromt and back is British but the center part with the command module is US. You need to work in lockstep with USA to fire them. Frogs have their own Ariane missiles and subs.

>>25601729 and for that sole reason i will never join if they want to start speaking English I will join

>>25601714 can you prove me wrong? can you prove that the americans dont have our nukes in a cuck cage? yes or no?

>>25601730 I demand my government uncucks our nuclear weapons programme

>>25601716 It isn't actually. But even if it were, the most I can say is that our nukes can be launched even without permission from the government. There are no codes or passwords involved.

>>25601714 i demand your response sir!

>>25601767 I want to trust you but I cannot

>>25601748 It just isn't cucked. It's not independent of the US supply chain, but it is independent of the US to use. They can be fired at any moment. Our system of authorisation is actually written letters lol. They don't even have to be read. Any senior commander could give the nod and they'd be lit. No American has any say on the launching our nukes. Americans do have a say on selling us more nukes.

The UK subs are also completely dependent on USA for service and maintenance. They have to go to Georgia to get missiles and service.

>>25601795 So you mean to tell me that, if we launched a nuke at New York City, the Americans couldnt prevent it?

>>25601800 but if we launched a nuke, would it get shut down remotely by the USA?

>>25601801 Hypothetically speaking yes.

>>25601806 Are nukes remotely disableable? *invented a new word wahoo

>>25601645 Even if french armaments were best on earth you simply can't produce them in sufficient numbers and fast enough. >Despite that, Australia later that year(2016) signed its largest-ever defense deal with DCNS for 12 Shortfin Barracuda Block 1A conventional diesel submarines. >Canberra was reportedly particularly keen on the French bid because of the ability to switch the Barracudas from diesel to nuclear power — technology that was deemed political poison so recently after the Fukushima disaster in Japan, but that the government believed could become more palatable in time. >Australia urgently needed new subs to replace its six aging Collins-class submarines, which were slated for retirement in 2026. Without subs, Australia would be left vulnerable at a time of increasing tensions with China. But the first Barracuda couldn't be delivered until 2035 or later, with construction extending into the 2050s.

>>25601812 in that case... i believe you... MIRTH!

>>25601819 i was under the impression americans could switch our nukes off from the point of launch

common UK w i fell victim to anglophobic lies

>>25601829 There is no known way of disabling or even shooting down an ICBM in 2025. The current defence hypothesis is space missiles from satellites could possibly shoot nukes in the sky. But this has yet to materialise.

>>25601865 im very happy you explained this to me cuz i thought that the americans could switch our nukes off if we fired them

>>25601870 I fell victim to propaganda

>>25600892 you fucking annoying retard from texas oblast - post keyboard.

>>25601195 no but the intel was. their american weapons work just fine but they have to find a way to get their intel from other sources now.

>>25600970 This tbh.

>>25601821 Oh man, very bad exemple: https://www.rfi.fr/en/international/20241214-former-admiral-urges-australia-go-back-on-aukus-deal-buy-french-subs >Former admiral urges Australia to renege on Aukus deal and buy French subs An article published by an Australian think tank is calling on Canberra to back out of the controversial Aukus submarine deal – which annulled a contract to buy French nuclear submarines in favour of UK-manufactured ones. [...] >"The reality is that the US is unable to build enough submarines," Briggs told RFI. >He added that, given that Australia is a 'three ocean continent" it needs 12 submarines in order to properly defend itself, rather than the eight specified under the Aukus agreement.

>>25602098 your empire of shit and decay rather has a civil war then european countries fighting a war against each other. but you can keep on dreaming about warzaw in 2 weeks you impotent and incompetent ape.

that feeling when the UK has an independent nuclear arsenal

that feeling when the UK has an independent nuclear arsenal

if russia, china, USA or France tries to nuke the UK we will nuke you back

>>25602193 Comrade Trampov will switch your nukes off. After that Putin will shoot your island with the poseidon nuclear torpedos.

>>25602193 Drumpf will disable your nukes remotely, then tell Russia to sink your stinking island under the waves

>>25602221 >>25602222 you lied to me before and tricked me i will not be tricked or fooled again

You niggers had the chance to have the best Europe under the control of hitler. We would be already on the mars, now all of your races getting replaced with muds and you will get send to die in front of Moscow.

>>25602240 hitler decided to start a war before he invented the assault rifle (STG-44) and ballistic missile (V2 rocket) that was his problem, not ours

>>25602244 >>25602222 i dont like you russians and americans teaming up i think its well nasty

I am glad my country has nuclear missiles and not only that, we have nuclear sumbarines that can launch nuclear missiles from any part of the oceans (2/3rd of the planet) whenever we feel like it

>>25600871 US provides Britain's launch vehicles (after they leaned on Britain to quit their independent and domestic ICBM and space program). You think they can't just disable that shit mid flight?

>>25602243 Why did you fight him? You could have made peace and still be some kind of an empire.

>>25602266 prove that they can disable our missiles mid flight i fell for your propaganda once before, i shannot fall for it again

>>25602267 yes. my family fought germany and frankly I apologse. it was the wrong decision. you were the good guys in ww2.

>>25602267 I apologise.

>>25602267 next time, wait until you have nuclear weapons

>>25602275 >>25602278 i accept it because i hate to see how london looks like today

>>25602285 telford-rotherham-oldham is worse wolverhampton-birmmingham is worse honestly, slough is worse than london dont keep shitting on london cuz there are worse cities

>>25602285 I got robbed in Manchester, never once have I been accosted or robbed in London

but you foreigners keep shitting on London cuz its the only city you have ever heard of

Poles getting completely cucked by burgers. I'm sure Polish F35 will work really well if they have to fight against Russia.

>>25602293 Noo, its the same here, almost every city is like that. I just didn't have a lot of names in my head.

guess who is about to delete every post he made in this thread?

Dear God, what's the problem with the brit dude?! More than 15 years of IB and I swear, I saw few childishly retarded ones like him.