I've spent a year in Bucharest after I've spent a year in Stockholm. I don't know what I liked more tbh, on one hand Stockholm is pretty, more orderly, more nature, more quite, but Bucharest is prime example of Eastern Euro capital -- rent is dirt cheap, consumption galore, malls everywhere, ubiquitous and cheap services, more open people, etc. What does Brent think? Is it better to live comfortable but risky life with hefty salary on the East, or pace yourself and live an average life on the Wect with a various social nets to pick you up should something happens?