Magnetic fields do no work.

also if we will be able to discover how to switch on/off the magnetic field of a non-electric magnets we will conquer the universe this is what soyentists should invest all their money into, instead of building stupid useless colliders

"continuous" is unrelated, there is not even a hint of that. "infinite" also unrelated. I think you're getting excited over Noether second theorem. >Noether's theorem states that every continuous symmetry of the action of a physical system with conservative forces has a corresponding conservation law. And it's not only about gravity.

>>25558001 it's about every fundamental force out there an electron can spin infinitely around the atom core, and earth can spin infinitely around the sun, yet i need to buy gasoline to move my car from one place to another it makes no sense

>>25558033 >and earth can spin infinitely around the sun It can't.

>>25558051 well for a very long time at least

>>25558033 >an electron can spin infinitely around the atom core, and earth can spin infinitely around the sun, yet i need to buy gasoline to move my car from one place to another >it makes no sense are you an's retard

the energy is in the magma and the mantle of the earth which is made of iron and the fact the earth is flying through space around the sun duh

>>25558245 you can't even comprehend what i am talking about

>>25557975 Maybe you just can't grasp the concept.

>universe is bugged Tell me about it

The energy was invested when you pulled two things apart

>>25558280 you obviously cant comprehend basic laws of conservation of momentum, dont talk back to me if you cant even figure out stuff that is well known for over 250 years

>>25558245 > an electron can spin infinitely around the atom core Electron doesn't spin around the atom core. > and earth can spin infinitely around the sun It cannot.

>>25558314 it's not about the laws

Magnets are like magic >>25557999 He's right, all the "scientific" explanations are cope and bullshit conjectures

>>25558312 Hasn't the energy already been invested over a course of period to achieve this matter?

>>25557975 >without investing any energy my theory is that something actually happens, we just havent noticed it. for example maybe there is equation between the work that the force of gravity of a body or a magnet is doing and for example the time of its half-life. like for example the time of half-life decreases a tiny bit, but we just havent noticed it

>>25558280 That's actually a very smart observation and a question that was posed by the people who invented the modern theory of the atom. Electrons that are being accelerated emit radiation, and thus lose energy. Electrons "orbiting" atoms are actually standing waves, described by the Schrödinger equation. They don't follow classical trajectories and they're not being accelerated, so they don't lose any energy. t. Different Bernd

There is far more energy expended when polarizing magnets then is created when they're put to use later on. Also, magnets to do not last forever and will slowly lose their polarity over time. Gravity is a byproduct of mass and not energy.

>>25558369 >There is far more energy expended when polarizing magnets then is created when they're put to use later on. Also, magnets to do not last forever and will slowly lose their polarity over time. interesting, so maybe in that sense magnets can be considered more like weird batteries, or a decaying radioactive material

>>25558033 >electron we don't even know if those really exist it's just how we model our observations