the company? potato merchants

OH SHIT sorry i forgot, you dont have any potatos

which would mean more money?

I would quit and get on the dole

>>25554505 > 20 usd per hour. > First world LMAO. t. Charger of 20 per hour from my clients, but everything is many times cheaper here inb4 vidya card retards

>>25554522 full time would mean 3k. i currently earn a little over 2k.

>>25554527 >ireland >first world PPPPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHAHA

Who the fuck works 70h?

>>25554512 Omg what a rube

>>25554547 i do. i like to be able to read a book in the garden if it's sunny. i like to cook quality meals every day. i like to be able to partake in various side projects or learning activities. i don't see how i could work 160 hours per month. 120 already seems like a lot. do you think i should try to negotiate with this new ceo to get 120h at 3k which would still be below my current hourly rate? this would at least still be a better hourly rate than what the previous company has paid me.

>>25554547 I assumed 70 hours per month, or about 18 hours per week. So part-time work.

>>25554567 >>25554547 yeah, 70 per month is weird here it's normally 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75 part time out of 160 per month

I'd look for another job tbh. But so long as you work as a part-timer, you're going to suffer this sort of instability. Employers won't feel like they owe you any respect. The trick is to get a full-time job where you don't have much work. That does mean you waste time in the office, but you can use that time to lurk kc and other stuff you'd do on a computer. It's still relaxing for the mind.

>>25554590 i don't see how i could realistically be actually productive for more than 4 - 6h every day. i suspect that people with full time jobs actually do around 3 - 4 hours of productive work per day and the rest is spent idling around the office. however i work from home so i can't idle around the office and count this as working. i'd much rather do what i have to do in the minimal amount of time required and call it a day. also what if the implicit assumption with this full time offer is that i would be working on "office terms" meaning i would be allowed to idle around during work time. this is a posibility, right? but i would feel like i am cheating in such a situation. i much rather would have my work priced realistically and be able to spend my time efficiently.

Double thread?

>>25554647 i was very chaotic in yesterday's thread and people didn't understand my predicament so i decided to create a new one

>>25554636 >the rest is spent idling around the office Yes. >i work from home so i can't idle around the office and count this as working. Wtf, you can do whatever you want. Nobody sees you. As long as you get work done, who cares how many hours you claim it took.

>>25554567 Oh you mean 70her per MONTH never mind then

what to do guys? i have to quickly decide

>>25555274 So the CEO is changing some policies that would reduce your pay except he offers you a different contract to get around that which actually pays you more, but you're too autistic to take it?

>>25555320 yeah, but i would have to work more than twice the amount of hours i currently work.

>>25555341 On paper.

>>25555274 So your question was: should you work more for less money? Sorry i can't help you.

>>25555341 what exactly are you doing?

tell him that maintaining the competitiveness of the company requires increasing the it budget to leverage the power of AI and blockchain in virtual reality

>>25556043 front end development

>>25556401 if you're any good you can LARP as a fulltime employee with no issues at all and still have plenty of free time i'd go for the FT

>>25556417 but what if they require me to be twice as productive as I have been so far with 70 hours? that would make sense from them, right? if i work 70 hours now than with 160 hours i should be twice as productive. even though currently i give away my most productive time during the day to this company so it would be hard to achieve that.

i still don't know what to do. why is taking consequential decisions so hard ;_;

>should I change 30$ per hour to 20$ hour kek

I wouldn't even consider waking up in the morning for a salary below CHF 60 per hour.

>>25557693 still so poor? sad.

Are you not full time? Full time will give you the ability to take a mortgage and build a home if that's your thing. Banks usually won't loan easily to casuals, contractors or self employed.