>>25546695 My countrymen are among the least free-minded of human beings. Not too fond of girls under 6 years old, but what harm has he done? None.

>>25547616 >but what harm has he done? supported toddler rapists by consuming their content?

>>25547661 By that logic true crime podcasts should be banned, because it supports serial murders.

>>25547661 Supported them telepathically?

>>25547676 Women get horny listening to serial murderers, I support banning them

>>25547661 Stop being retarded. 99.9% of the content on tor is free and the producer doesn't get 0.01 cent.

>>25547661 Retard moment,

rest in peace grandpa, hope that in the next life you're reincarnated in a free country like russia where toddler vaginas are legal to look at

>>25547676 podcasts about murders is not a crime, photo and video content with toddlers being raped is

>>25547683 I ain't a woman. Listening to descriptions of gruesome death makes getting through sucky work nights tolerable. Especially when there is come clever detective work involved in solving cases.

>>25547695 Nudism is also legal in the US, note that the purenudism website is hosted there

kek at the pedosubhumans rushed to the thread to defend their beloved toddler rapists

>>25547700 videos of toddlers being decapitated are legal

>>25547700 abortion is legal abortion videos are legal

>>25547700 You are very limited. You assumed she was raped, when it could have been a normal nude photo.

>>25547708 its a very grey zone if youre caught with nudist pictures you can easily go to jail. it depends on your "intent" on having those pictures. so if you give the judge the ick its over

>>25547721 Rule 1 of every pedophile is: Don't get caught.

>>25547717 from a pedoid point of view raping toddlers is "normal" as well

>>25547695 That video is fully legal in the US. Only way it could be argued as illegal is by intentionally placing it into a pornographic context. Like splicing it into a porn video compilation. Or storing it in the same folder as other child porn.

>>25547730 if its so legal then download it and send it to your mom

>>25547712 >>25547714 raping toddlers isn't legal videos with toddlers being raped aren't legal as well

>>25547737 my mom has more naked pictures of me than anybody else

>>25547727 Yes, yes, nude videos like this, >>25547695 are "rape" because femoid said. "When the only tool you have is a vagina, every problem looks like rape"

>>25547730 >>25547744 If it's yourself or your kid, they might allow it but they can deem any child nudity illegal arbitrarily as far as I know.

>>25547742 Killing people isn't legal, videos of people being killed are legal

>>25547744 your mom is a possible sick criminal if she posted online "i want to rape children i am a pedophile", her nude family photos instantly become child sexual abuse material that she possesses well shes a woman though so nothing will ever happen

>>25547737 Nah. I rather not have conversations about kids with my mom. She REALLY wants me to make grandchildren for her to dote on since my sister's kids aren't babies anymore. Sending her a vid like that would just taunt her and start up that argument again about me settling down and getting serious about finding a wife to make babies with.

>>25547757 She's smarter than that. She only shows them to people when they come to visit, and only if it will embarass me greatly.

>>25547760 i started sending my mom telegram stickers from cp girls and such, except not in cp situations and now she uses them too and sends them to me. she thinks its some cool hip young people thing i sent her these two videos i filmed and she just asked "oh, where are you going on the train?"

>>25547751 >they might allow it but they can deem any child nudity illegal arbitrarily as far as I know. Not really. The standards have pretty solid case law and there are tons and tons of examples of it being constitutionally protected when it isn't explicitly in a sexual context. You could be threatened over by a cop or prosecutor, but a good lawyer knows it's legal unless they can beyond reasonable doubt prove it's actually pornographic according the legal definition.

>>25547779 Dangerously based ngl

>>25547695 >toddler vaginas those aren't very common sight usually you get to see only vulva

>>25547857 wut?

>>25547616 could not make stupider laws than cp laws even if tried it's scientifically proven fact that porn reduces sex crimes cp laws cause children being hurt

>>25547936 He is being very technical as a shitty joke. Medically speaking the vagina just refers to the hole. The lips are called the vulva, which is the part typically visible when a toddler is nude. Under most circumstances you would have to gently spread the vulva to see the vagina.

>>25548001 no lips is lips vulva is whole thing

>>25547999 more child sex = good therefore laws encouraging child sex = good

>>25547695 >>25547779 Fucking based!

>>25548001 Oh, tks

>>25548125 interesting how my creepshots got deleted but not naked toddler

>>25549375 you can find naked toddlers on youtube if you look for stuff like potty training

If i ever become demented, i will just start talking about lolis and childporn and other deranged shit. I literally need to be put down before i get dementia.

>>25549556 lol Sometimes I wonder what things I might be saying in my sleep.

>>25549545 yeah, but mostly newborns

>>25549556 i thought same too but when i got drugged up i just sang soviet songs