What happened?

>roughly 3% of the browser market >how do we make our users hate us more

what you mean

>>25530392 >>25530403 they'll update their tos that they can sell your anonymized data

It sounds it does only apply to Windows binary? Oh that's shocking

>>25530411 >only apply to Windows binary where do you even have this from?

There's probably just going to be a unmozillad-firefox, no?

>>25530407 can keep using old version until everything clears out

diversity overdose >>25530392

I guess I'm switching to Brave because Edge it getting ublock origin removed

Chinese Via browser is literally the best mobile browser for now

>>25530438 >Brave Have you read their ToS?

I would say Pale Moon but lately Cloudflare has decided that it is not allowed so you can't complete the KC cookie challenge on unlocked.html with it

>>25530473 use degoogled chromium

Mullvad browser is basically TOR without TOR.

>>25530442 Me yes. t. Brave user

>>25530421 probably this

bro, are you that naive? you never have any privacy since day one

>>25530756 I hope my dickpics are sold at a fair to high prices

>>25530397 Brave, Opera, Vivaldi, Edge are all Chromium based. So they count als "Chrome". I just checked it with my Vivaldi browser. >>25530407 So they start doing what Google und Chrome does for years already... Google is an advertising company and with Manifest V3 adblocker will be removed. Clever :3

>>25533875 Funfact: Mozilla got the most money from google, for setting google as the standard search enginge

Use ungoogled-chromium.

>>25533890 You got google deeeeep very deep in your ass bro!

Why there so many "bernds" using chroem?

You know what to do.

I think I asked in another thread already: what's bernds onion/xp with waterfox?

I'll switch to ungoogled Chromium as my main browser. Right now, I just use it to watch porn hosted on my home server, but it's a very very good browser, probably the best in the market right now. It supports all the latest browser features like hardware-accelerated x265 decoding that Firefox doesn't (out of the box at least), and it's very light in terms of resource usage. As in, it uses about 50%-75% of the RAM that normal Chrome does. There's no reason not to use ungoogled Chromium tbh.

I'm just using Firefox these days because of nostalgia and habit. It's fat, slow, doesn't support a lot of features like Passkeys, AND spies on me and advertises to me by default. I'll migrate all my settings to ungoogled Chromium tomorrow. It's just that the process to install extensions on it is a pain in the ass.

>>25535105 Can it block ads as effectively as brave? For example on jewtube.

Any experience with duck-duck-go browser?

>>25535130 Yeah, install ublock origin. It still supports manifest v2 and I think will continue to do so forever. So you can install ublock origin from its repo as a manifest v2 extension, which works very well. Maybe Brave blocks ads better because its blocker is built into the browser, but I don't know, and ublock origin is more than good enough.

>>25530397 The AMD of browsers.

>>25535229 I don't remember AMD being hellbent on supporting faggots.

>>25535304 It's unreal how dedicated to faggotry Mozilla is. They're eagerly willing to go bankrupt supporting faggots. All the while not improving anything about the browser or implementing modern browser features for years.

Mozilla gifted us Rust Lang, so there's that.

I just use Brave

>>25535328 They're not going bankrupt. They're getting paid by google to do what they're doing. Their CEO is making millions.

>>25535344 Google will stop paying them if their market share goes to near-zero. Google pays them based on how many people use Firefox and therefore how many people would be given Google as the default search engine. Firefox's market share declines every year, and they keep making the product worse. It's only a matter of time. They tried other forms of monetization to counteract that decline, but those efforts failed. Mozilla's revenue from its deal with Google fell in 2023 and probably 2024. Its revenue from it's other poor attempts at making money also fell. See page 4 of this https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2024/mozilla-fdn-2023-fs-final-short-1209.pdf

>>25535420 It's beneficial for google to have "competition" and not be considered a monopoly. What they're paying is just pocket change for them anyway.

Does Mozilla want to lose most of the global market? I mean, there are more countries banning sell of personal data by foreign companies than those which doesn't. Would they risk Firefox getting banned by law in those countries and thus them losing most of the global market?

>>25535445 The point is that if Firefox's market share continues to fall lower than its 3% market share, Mozilla will no longer be useful for Google as a tool for claiming they're not a monopoly. So Google's incentive to keep them alive will go away if people keep leaving Firefox.

Heard good things about Ladybird browser. Might try it out.

>>25535540 It's not even in alpha yet. A bernd tried it a few months ago, and it didn't play youtube properly. kc worked mostly IIRC.

>>25535565 I am willing to put up with some jank if it means not dealing with "current year" enshitification.

>>25535627 Install ungoogled Chromium then

>>25530407 Oh that? Nothing new under the sun then