eurocucks really want a world war huh

>>25492233 “Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum” stupid ape, look at ukraine, gave up nukes for toiler paper

>>25492233 It's long overdue. Our current society has become weak and complacent relying on the US for everything and adopting their multicultural nigger politics. The sooner we're dragged into a World War the better.

Europeons are only 80 years late

First two World Wars worked wonders for Europe, innit? :DDD Idiots.

Nuking Cardboard Empire into oblivion My wet dream

dont the uk and frons already have nukes?

>gibs me dat Why are Germans like this?

Told you politicians browse KC

The French have nuclear submarines with completely domestically produced nukes and missiles. They will be very glad to build more of them and outsource the costs, they have proposed this to us multiple times in the past.

>>25492230 At the same time, we will achieve the 5% for NATO by that. That's what Trump wanted.

Nukes will save the world against mad dictators.

If Poland tries to get nuclear weapons we will have an immediate invasion by Russia. I suspect if western europe like germany tried US airforce would take off from Rammstein and bomb that reactor instantly. Germany actually should have it though. Completely out of the question for east europe however

Euros don't have enough Uranium anymore

>>25492230 Based. I've been saying this for years. Failure to protect Ukraine means nuclear nonproliferation is dead. Now either you need nukes or trustworthy allies.

Plus germany is infested with CIA, no way they can start nuclear program if their scientists start to get into deadly accidents left and right.

>>25492806 >muh powerfull CIA lel only in conspiratard dreams and CIA budget reports.

>>25492800 a) You don't need it, you can make atomomb from a load of different heavy radioisotopes, made in labs b) Ukraine has deposits

>>25492797 >immediate invasion by Russia With what fucking forces? The whole russian army is buisy in Ukraine. If anything RIGHT NOW is the perfect time to get nukes.

>>25492804 How would nukes help to Urine? US would talk you out of nuking us because we have more nukes and we can nuke US and Europe if we get nuked by their puppet.

>>25492813 >b) Ukraine has deposits Yes, right on our border. Good luck doing anything useful there.

> literally bothered by no-one < this is dangerous and we should start a war for peace! Eurotards are so, brothers.

>>25492819 >US would talk You can shove "talking" up[ your asshole.

>>25492814 >With what fucking forces? The whole russian army is buisy in Ukraine. You're delusional, Russia is maybe using 20% of its forces in ukraine, if that. Also it takes years to develop nuclear weapons on your own.

>>25492826 The fear is alredy in pigdog muscovite eyes. Love to see it.

>>25492800 We have huge reserves, the biggest of the continent.

>>25492839 >You're delusional No, you're delusional. Russia is throwing everything it has and even then it's not enough so they have to get North Korean help.

>>25492836 >>25492841 Your hands are shaking, pigdoggie. Yurop has nukes, if it wanted to use them, it would have by now. Even you threatened to use a dirty bomb and backed out. Well, that one was a rare display of dignity, give you that.

>>25492839 >Russia is maybe using 20% of its forces in ukraine So Putin isnt ending the war because he doesnt want to? You're saying hes retarded?

>Had the atomic bomb turned out to be something as cheap and easily manufactured as a bicycle or an alarm clock, it might well have plunged us back into barbarism, but it might, on the other hand, have meant the end of national sovereignty and of the highly-centralised police State. If, as seems to be the case, it is a rare and costly object as difficult to produce as a battleship, it is likelier to put an end to large-scale wars at the cost of prolonging indefinitely a “peace that is no peace”. >19 October 1945

>>25492843 >Russia is throwing everything it has No? They still have border guards, ABC, all the nuclear stuff, etc. Maybe "most" of their army is here, but not all.

>>25492845 Everyone needs nukes now. The only question is if they can afford it, but since North Korea has managed to get some , I'm sure a lot of other countries will be able to do it too. Especially now with landgrabs back on the menu and USA goung to isolationism mode.

>>25492847 Became mobilizing 90% of forces is going to fuck economy and create chaos. And because soldiers aren't as valuable when it's a drone&artillery war. The Ukraine isn't mobilizing 100% for the same reason, they'd completely break morally and economically. You're the retarded one.

> we must kiss our new master's ass because the old master "betrayed" our ass-kissing of him Would be funny if it weren't so cringe. But being cringe is the meaning of life for the belters.

>>25492858 Why would they need nukes if they're not prepared to use them at all? Wars will still be conducted conventionally. If Yuros want to have a resistance capability, they need troops, artillery and drones. Because Yurop is small, they can afford to fuck it up even further with nukes, they already had WW2 minefields untapped. If want, by all means, everyone in actual Yurop(except Goymany) had the opportunity and permission to have them. It's just not cost effective unless we're planning total war with Africa/Middle East/China/India.

>>25492871 By everyone I mean EVERYONE. Than includes Afghanistan, Taiwan, Liberia, Venesuella, Moldova, Georgia e.t.c. This is the path to finally using nukes again.

>>25492877 *shrug* Half the niggers will just nuke themselves back into stone again, and also shit the place up. That's the reason nuclear states don't allow everyone that. But I wouldn't mind gifting Iran nukes to finally deal with kikesrael. But really, the only way you're getting nukes back is becoming part of Russia again.

>>25492860 Lying retarded pidor lmao You are trying as best as you can without using nukes. You are using your whole army, and you are failing. There are 700k plus soldiers in Ukraine. >muhh we care about casualties!! Fucking subhuman, if that was the case you wouldnt send people in meatwaves in ladas and scooters. You do so because you have no other choice because you barely have any equipment left, not because this equipment is "hidden" somewhere and for whatever reason you dont wanna use it. Use brain nigger

>>25492913 Cope.

>>25492921 You will keep coping about how you are only using 1% of your military capability while soldiers drive around the battlefield in bukhankas and ladas. Reality is though and always comes back to hit your lies with a hammer.

>>25492929 You forgot donkeys. >Reality is though and always comes back to hit your lies with a hammer. Indeed, and that's why you're coping this hard.

>>25492935 >Indeed, and that's why you're coping this hard. How, do tell me. If you have most of your military resources untapped, why do you send meatwaves in old civilian trash vehicles and use animals for logistics? 4D chess? Gloves not off? If you just keep saying "cope" it's a confession you have no counter argument

>>25492947 I assume Trump meant in manpower, but some strategic resource of vehicles remains. We do not send meatwaves, cockholes do. As for vehicles, we use what's cost effective and less pricey to lose. They're more stealthy too. We already did that some 20 years ago in Caucasus before. Doesn't matter how unglorified it is, if it works.

>>25492455 First two world wars were europe-on-europe wars.

>>25492857 >border guards, ABC Rounds down to zero in terms of combat value.

>>25492860 >>25492839 Teenager level understanding. Support troops don't fight and they're not good for fighting either. If RU put 90% of their troops in UA they'd have nobody left to run supply chain, training, administration etc.

>>25492230 They can't do that. It would violate non-nuclear proliferation treaty and probably few others. however, it's time evropa stops relying on imported "security"

>>25493274 Treaties can be withdrawn from.

>>25493276 it will haz consequences

>>25493282 We are already living in the consequences. Also I believe EU as a whole didn't sign that treaty so there would be a EUFOR shaped loophole. Or we sign up for nuclear sharing or 'nuclear sharing' with France as we did with the US.

>>25492246 >filthy gypsy trying to understand politics Can‘t wait for Russia wiping you out of my Moldova.

Reality:

>>25492810 Nice oinking ciashill.

>>25492829 Last time I checked hohols were forgotten to be asked.

>>25492813 Ukrainium