Euroqueers left in the dust yet again

CRYPTOBROS ITS OVER

>>25481425 it is

I was told this was 40 years away. this cant be real

>Krysta Svore Damn!

>>25481435 Things are moving faster than anticipated.

How many qubits does it have? What about error correction? To crack elliptic curve encryption, you'll probably need millions of qubits.

>>25481425 I am pretty sure that computing evolution was taken in to consideration during the creation of BTC.

How do we get post-quantum crypto on a ryzen 7?

>>25481455 Trust the science chud

Just don't use a quantum computer if you have something to hide

This thing looks like a piece of art

>>25481455 The qubits created with topoconductors are faster, more reliable, and smaller. They are 1/100th of a millimeter, meaning we now have a clear path to a million-qubit processor.

>>25481485 Ok now translate it for a monky that went to public school Do we finally get to star trek technology?

>>25481499 Imagine a chip that can fit in the palm of your hand yet is capable of solving problems that even all the computers on Earth today combined could not!

and it was invented by a woman

or at least with women's help

developed with invaluable help of female scientists

>>25481531 What's surprising is that she is European and not Chinese.

China is vagina

>>25481521 But can it do simple shit like + - ?

>>25481521 Hopefully it will solve the no gf problem.

>made by microsoft i don't trust it'll be used for good, get ready to become a sigma goy

>>25481521 Everyone said this would never happen. Not for decades at least. Everything changes now.

>>25481521 Can it run Crisis?

How much does it cost?

>>25481408 There is not a single working QC because Quantum Error Correction is an unsolvable problem. It has been mathematically proven that. the more error correction you do, the more errors will aggregate further down the chain. QC is same scam as cold fusion.

>>25481531 Actually, it was invented by a brown man. Your centuries are over, ytoids.

>>25481615 So, 1. is microsoft pajeet scamming us 2. He has been scammed or 3. You are wrong?

I don't need that

Any leaps in hardware are ASAP matched by shittiness in software and things keep working pretty much the same. It's a law of physics.

Wtf is this new state of matter "topoconductors"

Figure 2: Roadmap to fault-tolerant quantum computation with tetrons. The first panel shows a single-qubit device. The tetron is formed through two parallel topological wires (blue) with an MZM at each end (orange dot) connected by a perpendicular trivial superconducting wire (light blue). The next panel shows a two-qubit device that supports measurement-based braiding transformations. The third panel shows a 4×2 array of tetrons supporting a quantum error detection demonstration on two logical qubits. These demonstrations build toward quantum error correction, such as on the device shown in the right panel (a 27×13 tetron array). Ok if you say so.

Keep in mind, they haven't actually built one with a million yet (the chip in the picture has 8), but they claim they have a path towards it now with the new qubit type

it's a nothingburger >And we’ve already placed '''eight''' topological qubits on a chip designed to house one million.

>>25481635 >>25481635 >>25481635 >>25481635

Its over for bitcoin.

Ok but hear me out bros... What if you like combine... Quantum computing with... AI Whoah...

>>25481672 >it's a nothingburger Just two more centuries

>>25481687 You could instantly train massive models

>>25481693 more hallucinations than ever more money laundering than ever more infinity jeets than ever

A few things to keep top of mind: Topoconductor is a word that they made up that isn't a technical term in the field or in any adjacent fields. It's stupid and you shouldn't say without rolling your eyes. Whoever came up with it should feel deeply embarassed for their role in this stupidity. There are way way way more than three phases of matter and we've been discovering and classifying them for >100 years at this point. So even talking about liquid gas and solid in the article/title is moronic. Creating Majorana quasiparticles has a long history of false start and retracted claims (discovery of Majoranas in related systems was announced in 2012 and 2018 and both were since retracted). The quoted Nature paper is about measurements on *one* qubit. One. Not 100, not 1000, a single qubit. Unless they think they can scale this up really quickly it seems like its a very long (or perhaps non-existent) road to 10^6 qubits. If they could scale it up so quickly, it would have been way more convincing to wait a bit (0-2 years) and show a 100 or 1000 qubit machine that would be comparable to efforts from Google, IBM, etc (which have their own problems).

>>25481478 Majorana (quasi-)particle in solid state physics? I sleep. I only care about Majorana sterile neutrinos and the seesaw mechanism, explaining non-SM neutrino mass terms, which would explain neutrino oscillations. >>25481646 In our quantum computing class, we learned about torus-shaped qubit lattices that assist with error correction. Basically, the information isn't stored locally in one qubit (error-prone) but in the global properties of the shape. >>25481685 I should join the quantum computing working group of my university and steal Satoshi's bitcoin, dump it and create a red candle straight to zero. >>25481693 Really? Is there a paper on this?

>>25481701 >more hallucinations than ever You could get rid of any hallucinations in seconds, automatically if this tech was actually real. But its as real as the room temp superconductor.

>>25481705 >random anime girl you're gay aren't you

>>25481705 > Really? Is there a paper on this? There is no way to do that yet. And there won't be for quite some while, because its all bullshit.

Is it too late to buy MSFT? I'm buying.

>>25481733 Pelosi already bought, you're late to the party

>>25481714 I'm a red-blooded heterosexual man >>25481719 I think I remember some papers on quantum data science, which would make AI training faster, but I don't know a lot about it https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.08805

>>25481478 Design looks kinda vintage. Probably the colours.

This is time.

sus

I like majiorana

onionbros is it over?

>>25482091 yes :bka:

>>25482068 I don't get what his point is. Does he think people at Microsoft can't read research papers?

Can someone explain why are we going to jail lol

>>25481408 you can tell it's real because it's made of gold jk it's not even a real prop it's just a render hey buddy why don't you LINK A FUCKING SOURCE IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A CLAIM FUCKING RETARD

>>25482250 They did not cite.

>>25482571 Did you try clicking the link in the OP?

>>25482571 They made it out of gold or else they would get their funding cut. This is a common occurrence in the public sector: You ask the government for taxpayer money. You get let's say $5 million. You do your project. You end up only needing $4 million. I've never heard of a case of anyone every paying the rest back, they always find some way to pretty much waste it. Why? The next time you ask the government for money, they'll ask: >How much did you need last time? How much do you have left? Everything, nothing, I need more money.

>>25482612 he link a picture of a retarded gold CG render and some idiot making shit up on shitter

>>25482669 That's the CEO of Microsoft.

>>25482670 All I see are claims claims with 0 evidence this is as real as that Chinese superconductor they just want to pump the stock price

>>25481521 Can kill all JEWS?

>>25481521 I cannot imagine it I am too stupid can you please do it for me?

Imagine trying to outthink the quantum AI

>>25482987 I read it twice but still didn't understand a thing. How is a CPU a monkey that can check all places at once? Makes no sense. Tell Grok to explain it better and simpler.

>>25483099 Why would designing new drugs be hard? It may be a logistical challenge, but not an intellectual one. Buy the precursors in China, react them in Canada and sell the shit in the USA. No Quantum computer needed. This Grok makes no sense.

>>25483130 Did you buy the Twitter+ subscription for 50 USD/m that you have access to Grok 3?

>>25483142 It's free. https://grok.com/

>>25483147 Alright, I thought the subscription was still required. I'll open a Twitter account then to access it.

>>25483150 You can make a separate xAI account.

>>25483154 Thank you.

>>25483147 Grok 2 still claims that Grok 3 is not available for free. Maybe it is in the USA but not in Europe?

>>25481478 >>25481408 Literally pajeet scam Innovation is dead, deal with it

>>25481622 The jeet and those other mostly huwite autists.

>>25483165 I don't know

item model pages during uk games you

find CARE text books out TIMES management group I KNOW

way am want research search

were industry join user size but provide credit look travel more

PRODUCT two long county has HIGH different

listing full american

at education

level LONG SAID

>>25481622 Poopjeet and a woman Yeah couldn't be more fake scam if it tried

v conditions two they o available PROJECT change questions college being photo online show

related private CITY products compare each health w provide section line point

was center old sales years art when insurance shop windows COURSE you the TABLE books

different special box many love card game COMPANY

number live which

POSTS HELP shall your WATER user course h need provided C

HOWEVER case comments now PAGE place SOUTH time york

ENGLISH jan sites READ ANOTHER photo GOOD york am low EACH human men

with

ebay view c shall family days

also

i see said know report HAS

care local last

value ONE CITY both CANADA where

accessories TRAINING JOB community pm

personal area SAY going

what world

current m OWN yes HOUSE services PRIVACY SUCH college address

look me Y return following o NOW line yahoo JAN shall day section information hot

join UK national

STILL STATE WHERE get yahoo la team november TABLE book first better BOOK FIND up

within case download see LITTLE windows air START credit

services index those press P copyright model white

home company should

l details many products SAY number

>>25481463 It was not. ECC is not quantum-safe.

look level END item jan LIBRARY

board men is estate start department OR another second add plan ebay top

low science please section shopping case links say

GOOD out company events GAY news part your store p LOOK STOCK type

teen BOX message this accessories think special best much location text into games

international human may directory type found how county TEAM any

INTERNET digital terms

security look user

>>25483866 Whales are shaking

If it was made at Microsoft it doesn't work

>>25481622 There are >9000 names on the paper