recent physics research from CERN suggest that most "dark energy" isn't real, but is actually in of itself fluctuations in spacetime itself. Which means the amount of matter we've observed/calculated is actually much more than there is, when considering special relativity's ability to warp spacetime this was previously difficult to do because CERN didn't exist to demonstrate the spacetime warping and computers weren't powerful enough to do the calculations using variable (ie, non-constant/static) values for spacial dimensions

>>25460171 changing your answer again lol shows that science was full of shit then and still is now

The sun and the other planets go round the earth on a big track and I won't hear it any other way. Simple as

retard thread [-]

>>25460193 How do you explain Jupiter's moons then?

>>25460202 it's a hologram come out of the cave with me

>>25460204 Ok, but only if you let me take your anal virginity.

>>25460182 science changes periodically, that is it's nature as new tools are developed. But it's not much different than what Eienstien first proposed.

>>25460209 I have none to give

Fun fact: Heliocentrism and geocentrism are both legit since a "center point" in a limitless space is arbitary. Heliocentrism is just easier to calculate so most people use it out of convenience.

>>25460210 Science changes every 10 years and always in line with socio-cultural memes.

>>25460213 Why should I listen to what an used up whore has to say then?

Imagine believing in such retarded concepts like dork matter and dinosaurs

>>25460153 dude, computers are not real.

>>25460255 Begone, spawn of demiurge

>Dark Energy >69%

>>25460182 faPUTA!

I don't get why the dark matter is such a difficult concept to grasp. It's a phenomenon that challenges current theories. It's not like physics was working perfectly, and then to make things more exciting, physicists invented this dark matter concept.