he was an ENTJ chad https://www.16personalities.com/entj-personality

"One death is tragic, one million deaths is an statistic"

All-knowing god commanded slavery, but somehow realized his mistake. Things change.

>>25519073 russians be like "SO TRUEE!!!"

>>25519080 >>25413074

>>25519082 r u ok m8?

Why do normies think Hitler is evil even tho he did the same shit as other conquerors? I don't know dude, it doesn't make sense.

Nobody complains about Genghis Khan, Stalin or Mao for example who had higher killcounts than Hitler but for some reason Hitler and only Hitler is demonized significantly

In my opinion, OP, it's simply a matter of perspective and whoever controls the narrative controls most perspectives

>>25519094 >>25519107 hitler was a german so he has the "ick" so to speak napoleon? french stalin? russian mao? chinese hell, even pol pot was cambodian but hitler was a german and that makes it "ick" i dont know why

The games nobles play are of no concern to us peasants

>>25519115 To be fair, killing Jews wasn't his best idea

You're expecting some sort of consistent internal logic to human behavior and its labels. Don't do that. It won't help.

>>25519107 Shitler ran a racial purification program in the occupied territories unlike other conquerors who wouldn't interfere with the local population as long as they accepted the new kang and paid taxes At the end of WW2 most ethnic Germans had been chased out of eastern europe by angry native mobs, not communist dictators

>>25519115 There are thousands of women who send love letters to dangerous criminals who have a Chadlike physiogonomy you don't see them complaining about all of this in reality which I find ironic in itself that women would value such things in a man and so it calls into question whether women themselves can be trusted with anything knowing this

>>25519140 >ran a racial purification program in the occupied territories unlike other conquerors No. Eastern Slaves were supposed to be farmers for the Reich. Jews were offered to leave, Hitler did not really wanted to kill them, but later in the war had to. This has been officially said so by the Israel premier minister Netanyahu only a few years ago "Hitler did not want to kill the Jews". https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2015-10-21/ty-article/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt/0000017f-dc2e-db22-a17f-fcbf7c1e0000

>>25519140 >Shitler ran a racial purification program in the occupied territories unlike other conquerors who wouldn't interfere with the local population as long as they accepted the new kang and paid taxes >At the end of WW2 most ethnic Germans had been chased out of eastern europe by angry native mobs, not communist dictators You had informal ethnic cleansings in history also, Hitler isn't the only one in this regard to have done that. He isn't special at all, Persiabernd..

>>25519107 i dont understand whether bernd asks this question just to get yous or if he's really confused hitler did the same as other conquerors but he was racist or at least emphasized his racist side way more than other conquerors did so if people who follow hitler's ideas have their way in society they'll be racist, not just generalists

>>25519131 no comment

>>25519131 It was, actually.

>>25519131 Fuck you, kike!

>>25519168 But if I were German and I wanted to live among only Germans why is this a bad thing that I would want this, that I would want a homogeneous German society and remove all other elements that would be maybe ruinous to my society? Is there anything wrong with that, why is it necessarily "bad" for me that I would want this? This is essentially what Hitler was espousing in his ideology.

>>25519168 This is really only a matter of perspective and that's all it is, I'm not condoning Hitler and what he did, I'm just saying if I were German I may have approved of this in an earlier time period.

>>25519168 >>25519166 Other conquerors would genocide villages and towns for military purposes or as revenge, they didn't plan on implementing industrial racial purification programs USSR had 20 million soldiers die and some nations like Poland and Belarus had 25% of the entire country die because of Shitler's chimpout. That leaves a massive generational trauma, specially with how recent it was

As I said before though, ethnic cleansings weren't at all unique to Hitler, I mean this was happening with the Balkans for quite sometime even in modern history.

>>25519205 >>25519210 napoleon emerged in a period where aristocracy was the boogeyman who was starving french people left and right hitler emerged in a period where jews were the boogeyman who were starving and impoverishing german people left and right aristocracy can be more generalist than jews can

>>25519210 I for one condone what Hitler did.

>>25519216 >>25519216 so when the mongol eradicated entire ethnicities in central asia it was different, because they did it out of "revenge"?

>>25519222 Probably because it was a cleansing of the jews. Notice they get so insane about any transgression that they literally have passed them down for thousands of years and they are now the basis of the thought processes of billions of people. Weird

>>25519227 I don't condone losing

>>25519227 Well I don't because I hate everyone and humanity is fucking retarded but that's aside from the fact that killing isn't wrong necessarily as it depends on the context as to why these things happen.

I think it boils down to: "he's killing people and conquering places to satisfy his ambitions, but at least he's not racist or encourages racist laws"

Morality is fake shit to control cattle Nietsche talks about this in anti christ but soy fags call him edgy like it means shit

Rulers of world dont have morality Look at Trump Musk bezos putin All have power and money and do crazy shit. Pikachu face how do all bad guys get top position I wonder why

>>25519223 Fuck off, monkey. Not reading your inane uninformed opinions

>>25519068 The thing is Napoléon was a minor noble. >>25519223 >napoleon emerged in a period where aristocracy was the boogeyman who was starving french people left and right Aristocracy has already been wiped out by the revolution. Napoleon brought a stop to the revolutionaries trying to create an ever permanent revolution in france and in europe. >>25519244 >I think it boils down to: "he's killing people and conquering places to satisfy his ambitions, but at least he's not racist or encourages racist laws" Napoléon reinstated slavery in the colonies.

If somebody is killing another, unless they're insane, they most likely have a very good/strong reason why they're doing that. In my opinion, it doesn't diminish what they did even if it was a "racist" or whatever sort of targeting.

And the Jews themselves sort of have a track record of being rather, I suppose "bad people", why should we blame the host population for routing them or killing them en masse

Hear, hear, Mr. Raskolnikov, none truly matters besides power. The strong thrives, the weak dies. That is the only morality that matters. The poor women are just prostitutes to the rich today as they have always been. The poor men are just genetic fodder to be wasted away at the whims of the powerful. The only true sin is being caught in the act, which Napoleon managed to avoid for twenty+ years, thus cementing himself as history's greatest. He was so great that he was even granted an extra hundred days Hail Mary. So learn accordingly: fuck all morality, fuck all belief, fuck all that is good and fuck all that is evil. Theft is only wrong is if the stolen property was mine, murder is only wrong if it is not for my own advancement. If I do not wish to inherit this Earth, I wish another man to inherit instead, then prostitute my daughters and emasculate my sons. The strong thrives, the weak dies. The only true ideology is Bonapartism, that is the belief of one in oneself and one's own glory. Never admit to this in public, however, as in the Republic: the life best lived is of the impious man who can get away with impiety by pretending virtue. Do not engage with political religion (the 'isms' of this world), for all it is is a tool to acquire power, and there is no rightful rule for no one rules with a prayer book. If you need a home, support the ideology provided only that it will allow to acquire one for yourself. If you want to keep your home, support the ideology that undercuts the greed of the enemy. This world belongs to evil. For evil acquires power, and power allows you true freedom. Don't like it? Acquire the power yourself. Lift that axe.

>>25519358 >Lift that axe.

>>25519358 silly Bernd yet Caesar left a little money to every Roman citizen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9Mtos Be stronger, smarter, better, deadlier.

>>25519289 that doesn't take back from what I said, it just means that the local boogeyman question was already taken care of in the case of france, the boogeyman was already taken care of, in the case of germany, not really a victory over the aristocracy after outright humiliating and destituting them was enough, a total deportation of jews or mass extermination of them was what was necessary for the germans, and that means defeating other nations that were controlled by the jew internationally who was undermining the german man >Napoleon brought a stop to the revolutionaries trying to create an ever permanent revolution in france and in europe. it's just funny that both napoleon and hitler's reigns lasted almost the same, napoleon's rule over france lasted 15 years, hitler's rule 12 >>25519289 >Napoléon reinstated slavery in the colonies Again, since there was no heavy emphasis on race, contemporary people don't see any reason to lump Napoleon together with the likes of Hitler People will see Napoleon as the good emperor guy rather than the evil racist guy because at the very least, he did not practice emphasization on categorizing certain people as racially inferior during his campagins or his government