Do kings actually do anything I dont really think so

>>25513339 They do some things but alot of it is delegated to advisors or men of the court

Once a king, always a king, but once a night is enough.

Kingship was an ancient forms of governance. Why did it change? Jews and liberal democracy, yes, but why does Kingship pose a threat to them

>>25513366 >forms form*****

I dont know what i would do if i was a king Maybe something with androids

>>25513369 A lot of people are angry that you spent trillions of dollars on Androids. Despite making advancements in bio-cybernetics and autonomous AI agents, the news media and academia around the world have been rallying against the ethics of your creation. They're being used by incels as substitutes for women. This has furthermore angered women and has mobilized a base to turn your country into a republic. You are at risk of getting the bad ending.

>>25513388 >mobilized a base An active political base at that.

They got to watch their food tasters eat the food while it was hot, then wait a couple hours to eat the food themselves. Is being king worth a life without spontaneous snacks?

>>25513332 Play CK3 you just fuck everybody's wife and underage daughters, also childe marriage

apparently it was difficult enough that they all were killed or abdicated all responsibility 2 centuries ago

>>25513366 A king and his famiry are tied to the land and the people and so are invested in the future of those 2 things. Democracy is easily subverted by money and media lies. These crafty fuckers plot for eons about everything, sounds cray but it's true.

just do what king charles is doing

>>25513620 What exactly is he doing?

>>25513620 That's not a king it's just a figurehead posing as a king, there's a difference

You need victories