/int/ - This very normal-minded woman is arguing against firing totally useless employees because of their n

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:04:22 GMT No. 25501461 [Kohl] [Report thread]

20250224_100109.jpg

105.25 kB, 944x794

This very normal-minded woman is arguing against firing totally useless employees because of their needs. Pay careful attention: She is saying "it is wrong to fire 100% useless people because THEY HAVE NEEDS." This is how the mind of a woman is built to care for babies. Babies have needs, and you can't expect them to provide anything. The mother says: "the baby! The baby! The baby NEEEEEEEEDS!" And then men provide for the baby. This woman - who I'm gonna guess doesn't have her own kids - is not demonstrating empathy for adults, as she wants you to believe. She is demonstrating empathy for BABIES, but DIRECTED at adults. This is basically a phantom pregnancy. This is how putting women in charge of things destroys nations. When men are in charge, they say "what are YOU gonna do for ME? What value do YOU bring to the company? The army? The nation?" Men have to think this way because if you give out more than you take in, you die. Most women have no awareness of this at all. I call this "Santa-ism," because of how it resembles a child expecting magical free presents from Santa. "Cost? What's a cost?" This is one reason why women fight so hard to take in infinity invaders and pay for them using your money. There's no such thing as a "cost" in the average female mind. The invaders are just babies who neeeeeeeeeed! Give them their needies, you NAZI! Leftism is a mental illness caused by women not getting pregnant early enough in life, having a phantom pregnancy directed at useless, needy people (because that's how her mind recognizes babies), and then becoming violently angry when men don't want to feed her "babies." And then weak, selfish men become leftist as a way of making those insane women feel validated, which causes comfort, and then they just hang around like buzzards until one of those women has a moment of desperation and selects a sub-par male. Remember, politics is just psychology + economics, and psychology is just applied biology. Feminism and leftism is just baby-crazies turning women's minds inside-out from lack of reproductive success, and weak male scavenger sexual strategy.

Total posts: 59, files: 4 (Drowned at Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:04:42 GMT)

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:06:55 GMT No. 25501471 >>25502073

just gas all women problem solved

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:08:18 GMT No. 25501478 SÄGE! >>25501487 >>25502120

not reading all this shit... reddit post

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:11:14 GMT No. 25501487

>>25501478 It's actually a Tw*tter post (now X).

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:13:46 GMT No. 25501496 SÄGE!

Time for your meds weirdo

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:14:29 GMT No. 25501502

>avatar is a nun who smokes onion discarded

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:15:24 GMT No. 25502073 >>25502101

good thread actually >>25501471 if by gas you mean rape, then yes.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:23:12 GMT No. 25502097

haruhi_daumen hoch.jpg

24.82 kB, 313x239

>>25501461 Very good post, and one of the smartest I read in weeks on the KC. 9/10

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:24:14 GMT No. 25502101

>>25502073 Women above age 30 without kids should be gassed.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:31:56 GMT No. 25502120

>>25501478 > leftist are illiterate Who knew

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:34:12 GMT No. 25502127 >>25502134

Nobody gave a shit about 10+ million losing their jobs during covid But now when the public sector nobility lose a few thousands ...

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:35:32 GMT No. 25502130

female hysteria was thing in the early 1900s soyence concluded it was due to lack of dick

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:38:09 GMT No. 25502134

>>25502127 These people laughed when the government had people summarily fired people for not complying with their injection mandates. They had whole subreddits mocking them.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:42:02 GMT No. 25502152 >>25502183

>>25501461 Most of them are getting rehired as soon as they realize that they can't do shit without them. These aren't bureaucrats with cushy salaries and vacation time, these are people who do grunt work and the lowest level, they are needed and are inexpensive. With some luck they'll be smart enough to fire people who are actually worth firing.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:45:30 GMT No. 25502174 SÄGE! >>25502549

Yea Imma totally read that badly formatted rant of an Italian, give me one second

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:48:17 GMT No. 25502183 >>25502203 >>25502507

>>25502152 I can't understand how a government would stop working without the job of people who does things like coordinate donations to combat disinformation about trans kids in Uzbekistan, enforce inclusion of black and trans latinx folks into public departments and write reports about the state of fish in San Francisco bay. Maybe that is just a misunderstanding of mine, but you could explain to me.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:50:41 GMT No. 25502199

Women see job different from men: they see is as an activity, as a game, as a pleasure - as a process without clear meaning. Men are mostly see a job as a mean to achieve a certain result. So, you see people who don't contribute to achieving a desirable result as a dead weight. While women see just people performing a play and simply can't see any reason to remove them. Compare a tag game and a professional football. You can see why you want to get rig of a sportsman who can't 'tag' when your goal is to win no matter what. But it's stupid to remove bad players from your tag game as it only makes the game more boring, and also you clearly worsen the relations with the kids you're removing by doing that. As for the question should the government cut off dead weight and excessive spending - it's a question of the final goal. The state isn't a business enterprise. It's goal to facilitate and provide a normal predictable social environment to the people. Efficiency isn't the main goal of the government. Just look at state-backed healthcare systems in Europe and Canada. The bureaucrats try hard to make the system more 'efficient'. In result it's easier to get you euthanized than to treat your appendicitis. Or look at cops: they should provide a peaceful life without fear to lawful citizens. But in many cases the police itself becomes the source of fear and anxiety in the society. Or secret services: they should help people to live without fear of terror. So, if they worked towards the goal they should be 'invisible' to the lawful society. Instead they themselves turn into a major threat. And the law obedient citizens live in constant fear and fret over their every action out of fear about alphabet agencies. Back to the question. Should the state get rig of useless contracts and pursue efficiency? As a secondary goal - sure. But only if that doesn't affect the primary goals much.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:51:22 GMT No. 25502203 >>25502232

>>25502183 I'm talking specifically about park rangers and civil servants, i could care less about "humanitarians" and "scientists".

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:52:22 GMT No. 25502210 >>25502255

And it's always emotional appeal, I genuinely believe that leftism is only possible when people start to see the world from an emotional perspective. The social engineers manipulating the average leftist don't actually believe in progressivism, they are psychopaths who use emotional blackmail to achieve their goals.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:55:32 GMT No. 25502229 >>25504244

>>25501461 Where did you get the idea that park rangers and scientists are useless?

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:56:03 GMT No. 25502232

>>25502203 You underestimate the surplus of civil servants in the public administration. On the park rangers department you have dozens of paperwork "park rangers" who won't do anything, you can accumulate functions on a few and problems weren't. You make it sound like they have fired every single one of them, like they did with USAID, but they didn't, they took out just a good handful in actually useful agencies.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:00:28 GMT No. 25502255 >>25502276

>>25502210 I believe current left/right dispute is so widespread worldwide because ultimately it is a dispute between our two main insticts that drove us to dominate the planet: our strong social integration (skill to follow the group trends and moves without thinking, very useful when doing group hunting) and our rational pragmatism, resource management skills, etc. very linked to agriculture and cattle raising. I don't think it is only a coincidence that ranchers worldwide are vastly right-winger while social workers are left-wing.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:05:30 GMT No. 25502276 >>25502297

>>25502255 Exactly. Ultimately, it's a dispute between feminine and masculine forces.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:10:45 GMT No. 25502297 >>25502317

>>25502276 So why do these "feminine" forces promote childlessness then?

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:14:55 GMT No. 25502317 >>25502328

>>25502297 Because they don't want any obligations or duties. The female wants all the benefits of being a housewife without the obligations and commitments.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:19:19 GMT No. 25502328 >>25502356 >>25502571

>>25502317 That´s not female then. Females want to reproduce and care for their offspring. Wanting >all the benefits of being a housewife without the obligations and commitments on the other hand is a social construct originating in another source.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:24:04 GMT No. 25502344

Cavolo, pensavo che gli italiani fossero persone intelligenti, ma non mi aiuti a mantenere questa idea! Ok, there are scientists and scientists, but not all of them are useless, as veterans, that deserve some respecto too. Civil servants too, there are useful ones as firefighters, policemen... You interpretation are totally off from the text.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:25:01 GMT No. 25502349

>>25501461 >the mind of a woman is built to care for babies Watch women who recently ahd children. They HATE kids.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:28:23 GMT No. 25502356 >>25502385

>>25502328 Females weren't able to protect themselves against wild animals and barbarian tribes, so they had to find a male partner that was able to provide resources and security. Women only do something in exchange because they don't want to lose the stability brought by the male. They will stop taking good care of your prole the moment a crisis comes in.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:29:07 GMT No. 25502363 >>25502382

>>25501461 >This very normal-minded woman is arguing against firing totally useless employees because of their needs. > this is why arguing with foids makes no sense I realised that in university

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:29:43 GMT No. 25502367

>>25501461 Go get educated. There is no such reality. Also, so many posts about generalizing men and women, what drives them, etc. That's such a strong fallacy. The world has a spell on it. You all had better break the spell before it breaks you all.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:33:04 GMT No. 25502382

>>25502363 >>25501461 to add, to this day I remember two of such discussions one was "if employer has to pay maternity leave for women, he is obviously more likely to hire men" and all the foids were like "nooo but woman needs to have support when she has a baby" and "but what about falling birthrates", and if you replied "why is it supposed to be problem of a small employer to keep providing for one woman, not her husband/family/governtment" they would just keep repeating what they had said previously and never address any rebuttall same with discussion whether women in army should get penalized for getting preggers when they are serving, and obviously it was the same discussion

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:33:37 GMT No. 25502385 >>25502396 >>25502440

ClipboardImage-1740404015.png

113.34 kB, 640x438

>>25502356 Meanwhile men often leave women and children behind, while mothers care for their offspring as good as they can.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:36:32 GMT No. 25502396 >>25502453 >>25502457

>>25502385 >Meanwhile men often leave women and children behind more like family courts give custody to mother 99 out of 100 times, even when she is clearly less capable or inclined to care for the kid here we had a case recently when a foid lefta young daughter with nuns because she didnt want her anymore, and her father was fighting hard to get the custody, but family court would rather put the girl in orphanage than have the father raise her then the woman changed her mind, and the court immediately gave her the kid back

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:44:22 GMT No. 25502440

>>25502385 Do you know that women are usually the ones who start a divorce? The man is usually forced to leave his children behind because his wife was an evil whore who cheated on him. Meanwhile, women can steal the resources of their husbands through family courts and pensions. >while mothers care for their offspring as good as they can So it means that they can't take good care of their offspring because we live in a generation of children raised by single mothers and everyone is suffering with depression and other related issues.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:45:53 GMT No. 25502453

>>25502396 and don't forget that nowadays the state replaces the role of the husband, if it weren't for that the abandonment of children would be infinitely greater te

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:46:16 GMT No. 25502457 >>25502469 >>25502506

>>25502396 >family courts There is no such thing as court or often even family in the first place for men leaving women more or less shortly after getting them pregnant when not married.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:48:29 GMT No. 25502469 >>25502515

>>25502457 >woman fucks a random bad boy with even no basic prophylactics such as condom >is shocked when he leaves her preggers women are to blame 9 cases out of 10

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:54:56 GMT No. 25502506 >>25502522

>>25502457 The simple solution is to not engage in reproductive acts with men you do not trust to stay by your side and raise their children. Not our fault you guys fuck retards

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:54:58 GMT No. 25502507 >>25502579 >>25504355

>>25502183 >I can't understand how a government would stop working without the job of people who does things like coordinate donations to combat disinformation about trans kids in Uzbekistan, enforce inclusion of black and trans latinx folks into public departments and write reports about the state of fish in San Francisco bay. Maybe that is just a misunderstanding of mine, but you could explain to me. It has a lot to do with how organizations like USAID are actually used as a spook front. The formal descriptions aren't necessarily all that's really being done. Go read "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters". From an economic perspective it also ties into ways in which the federal government creates aggregate demand to maintain a "middle class" that would probably be shrinking a lot faster than otherwise. You saw Reagan try to do the same policies as Trump and it lead to deindustrialization and it turned out corporations aren't willing to absorb all those freeded up resources and you make more money doing downscaling, mergers and acquisitions to impose better pricing strategies.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:56:32 GMT No. 25502515 >>25502521

>>25502469 Of course. But they care for the baby nevertheless, why he doesn´t care at all.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:57:44 GMT No. 25502521 >>25502538

>>25502515 >But they care for the baby nevertheless is dont most women suffer from post-partum depression and they have to force themselves to care for the baby

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:57:44 GMT No. 25502522 >>25502559

>>25502506 It´s not about stupid decisions, but instinctive behaviour and care for the offspring.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:02:02 GMT No. 25502538 >>25502566

>>25502521 >post-partum depression >most While in reality it´s just 10-15%.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:04:50 GMT No. 25502549

>>25502174 It takes less than a minute to read it. If you are not retarded.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:06:46 GMT No. 25502559

>>25502522 No, as you can see from your very chart 70% of men, at worst, stick around to raise the children together. The majority of the remaining 30% are likely driven off by the mother herself. This whatabout is inherently about stupid decisions. Those bastards you're so concerned over would never exist if their mothers stopped for ten seconds and asked themselves "Will this guy make a good father?". But you're not actually worried about the bastards, it's the stupid whores who couldn't keep their legs closed which pull on your heartstrings

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:07:52 GMT No. 25502566 >>25504362

>>25502538 in reality it's above 50% 10-15% is the reported numbers, but most women suffering from it are too embarassed to admit this, because they fear being labelled "bad mothers" Ask any midwife working with women after birth, they will tell you this, or literally any healthcare worker who works with mothers.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:11:15 GMT No. 25502571

low quality bait.jpg

16.34 kB, 600x600

>>25502328 >Females want to reproduce and care for their offspring.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:13:13 GMT No. 25502579

>>25502507 Good post!

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:22:02 GMT No. 25503121 >>25504371

i actually agree with this. im not a leech in any way as i've worked in the private sector my whole life, but i do agree that the state should provide for the needs of some people to maintain social peace.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:23:07 GMT No. 25503125

Why do they get the ick when this manbaby incel cries how he NEEEEEDS her then?

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:05:35 GMT No. 25504080

She is not wrong, ideally you'd want to relocate those people to another activity, find a way to make them useful. And if that's not possible, since getting rid of them is so disruptive, it's something that should be done with prudence, which doesn't seems to be what's happening.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:24:17 GMT No. 25504219

Fuck, this Italiano is so based.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:26:56 GMT No. 25504244

>>25502229 scientists doing groundbreaking work on gender studies are not useless!

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:44:35 GMT No. 25504355

>>25502507 Nice, what audiobook services do you use?

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:45:51 GMT No. 25504362

>>25502566 Dude, women complain about everything

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:47:29 GMT No. 25504371

>>25503121 The issue is that it is the taxpayer. Italy has a huge tax burden just like any other EU state. Something needs to be done.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:49:24 GMT No. 25504380

OP is absolutely right.

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:54:05 GMT No. 25504406

>>25501461 i agree with firing useless employees but i think park rangers are not useless. i think they have all been doing real work and were even understaffed. others i dont care for

Bernd Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:57:36 GMT No. 25504427

>>25501461 Genuinely smart post on the KC. Thank you, OP.

Thread interest score: 6.5 Thread size: 176.55 kB