Based. But 10 years

Never. Sexrobots would objectify women so their prosuction will be prohibited.

how long until people realize they are being piloted by pajeets?

>>25493280 You say that like it's a bad thing. Imagine forcing pajeets to roleplay dirtiest shit possible. They'll go insane/go tranny, either way net benefit.

As soon as it can do behavioral advertisement to you between sex

give it a decade they already have silicone pocket pussys, they already have humanoid robots, they already have A.I. that passes the turing test we also can grow mammals as feotuses in plastic bags women are about to go redundant

I want a fembot companion that will allow me to love it, do cringe romance shit and not judge. And to imitate loving me back (like a real women that imitate love sice they are incapable of it). I don't want any of that power dynamics stuff, no shittesting, no illogical outburst of hate, no slapping in bed because 99% of foids like to be slapped. Just a romantic companion to spend time with.

why would I want a woman that hates me over a robot that can simulate genuine affection to a degree that passes the turing test and if i want kids why not grow one in a controlled enviroment with all sorts of genetic disorders selected out of the equation

>>25493358 It will sell you products, dont you understand?

its like having a pet dog except you can fuck it and it can assist you in several capacities whether or not it is disloyal comes down to a matter of code

the coding of biofems is faulty. it has significant flaws. they will have to improve or be selected out of the matter.

>>25493366 As if women are not the main spenders in the west, foids control like 85% consumer spending, they are the real consooooomers. If a fembot can simulate love then I can spend some money on the simulation, it's okay.

>>25493366 a sexbot will cost a fraction of the amount women cost in the long term having a wife or several girlfriends will cost you a hundred times more in a 30 year time span than having one sexbot especially once hyrdrogen fuel electricity and nuclear electricity makes the cost of running appliances is minimal

there will be significant shaming of men who go out in public with sexbot escorts in the beginning until most men realise that having a non-nagging non-judgemental loving wife that costs less than £100 a year to keep maintained is better than the alternative (biofems) and they can make sexbots that look like anything you want

>>25493366 i'm willing to bet that there's a group of autists that will make some kind of open source software to jailbreak the sexbots if it comes down to it. that will also allow you to modify her personality and actions to suit your preferences.

If i was a woman i'd be very worried but, as per usual, women are totally oblivious to the progress of mankind and the direction we are heading in

in the future men with sexbot escorts will look on the men of the past with pity the same way we, with Anaesthetic, look on the wounded of the past with pity imagine going back a thousand years and telling a man who has to have a surgeon pull glass out of his arm or right a broken bone that in the future they would have technology to make him feel no pain he would be amazed this is how future men will look at us who suffer with females in this day and age

>>25493393 Australia already banned importing onaholes from Japan. They also banned ""child-like sex dolls" (who knows what their definition of 'child' is). I'm willing to bet that most cucked countries will ban them for 'ethical' reasons (i.e to maximize shareholder profits, since men tolerating and performing social rituals with real women allows more money to flow into their pockets)

>>25493408 there will be a black market there will be free states there always was and always will be

banning a.i. sexbot escorts will only make them more attractive to free men

>>25493410 We will start a revolution, form an urban guerilla force, start destroying points of interest. Until they listen to our demands they won't have a single good night's sleep. And neither shall we.

>>25493417 I dont think sexbots will replace women, i think women will be forced to become loyal and attractive in a spiritual sense or else be replaced i think it will destroy 80% of women

>>25493420 women are coomers too, just look at Love in Deepspace. they'll certainly have their own sexbots, perhaps those sexbots will be loaded with real sperm so that humanity won't completely die out.

>>25493431 good for them, i really dont care what they get up to never have done and never will i feel sorry for a kid whose dad is a robot and mum is a coomer though, thats just sad even the most incel coomer men will be better at raising a child than a woman many single mothers produce really fucked up kids and its tragic the lack of a father is a crushing thing

>>25493434 Men know when they are abusing or neglecting their child, women often dont know what is going on at any given time we will have a generation of people raised by A.I. because their mums couldnt find a man and be loyal to him

>>25493439 whereas a child whose mother is a robot might be able to accept this when he has a father who is a human mothership is about providing comfort, fathership is about providing leadership and direction I trust a robot to provide comfort more than i trust a robot to provide leadership

women are just vessels maybe papist catholics disagree, since they think the virgin mary was the mother of God no, she was a vessel. she was chosen by God to be a convenient berth since she had the bloodline of David and was innocent its the father and the son, not the mother and the daughter God made Adam first. Papists HATE this though, they are the original feminists

fml

on the sixth day Deus Pater, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost said to each other "let us make MAN in our image" not woman Man.

there was no virgin mary at the beginning of creation she wasnt born until the first century of the year of our lord

our father who art in heaven not mother

im rambling now so im gonna stfu I think i made my point though

>>25493471 you sure did.

>>25493453 If you take the story seriously, god preferred raping a teen girl instead of just creating a baby or adult Jesus.