Me the father

I have 1000 dads.

Just imagine her getting child support from that 1057 men.

The only objevtive problem with the child is the reduced eugenic selection pressure on the genes of the father, because anyone can have sex with her. If the father is an average man (or at least tall and white) and the mother is above average, the child will be fine. Probably.

>>25485556 I think my son might grow up looking hot Both me and wife are jawgarchs

The ultimate mutt baby will be born

>>25485583 Good

>>25485533 birthcontroll works 99,9% of time :D

Little poor fucking brat, just imagin having SUCH a mother

>>25485604 Would bernd rather have a FtM father or a mother like OP?

fake news

>>25485628 Mother like OP, 100% I already have to greed aspect of OnlyFans most hoes

I will step up and be a man and raise that child if no one else will.

>>25485556 the problem will be the shame the child experiences its entire life having such a mother

Kek, they were not using condoms? Imagine fucking a woman that has other mens sperm inside.

>>25485676 Would Bernd rather be born as a 8/10 Chad to a turbowhore mother or a 2/10 trucel sonbasket, but your mother was a virgin when she met your dad?

Well, her face looks like she also got the aides from her adventures and not very long to live.

>>25485688 imagine your dick looks like that in order to scoop out other mens jizz :DDD

>>25485792 How do you know what my dick looks like?

>>25485556 Germany at it again. What are good genes? >>25485733 Honorable behavior is more important than looks, of course. >>25485733

>>25485792 I wonder what it feels like to use the dick for its intended purpose. Apparently it's a fetish for some guys. I have read about it on web forums about prostitution.

I really like this threda dvelving into serious business discourse about Penises. Something I always wanted to do with the Bernds. So, why don't humans have penis-bones? I've read the theory that us humans ate so many mushrooms and therefore our body-parts down there started to look like em.

>>25485792 Funny, women are such whores that men had to evolve jizz scooping penises.

>>25485848 Good genes are genes that are: A. Prone to replicate themselves via sexual selection That's it. This includes surviving long enough to reproduce. Today, most people die of natural causes at an advanced age, with ample opportunities to reproduce. Attractive men have good genes, because more women allow them to impregnate their bodies, which replicates their genes. These things are usually tied to physical characteristics that once had a survival aspect (well developed jaw for chewing, tall to defend yourself and your offspring, a masculine face to signal both high testosterone and also a good immune system, because testosterone is immunosuppressive, so fending off diseases = having a symmetrical face, while under the influence of high serum testosterone means good immune system, intelligence = ability to survive, provide resources to the woman and your offspring, rise to the top of social hierarchies...) Honor or the lack of honor, can't be passed onto your children. The only thing you would inherit from this kind of mother would be above average genes for looks, because she was able to earn money with her looks, a fast life history strategy, and probably light personality disorder problems as her behavior is not indicative of an optimal female mating pattern, so she probably has some mental problems, which are heritable. If you meet new people who don't know your mother, they would treat a highly attractive man (even with slight personality problems) a lot better than they would a highly unattractive individual. They would perceive the attractive man to have a better personality via the halo effect, all of these effects are only enhanced in a reproductive context. >>25485877 You're probably onto something

>>25485965 >A. Prone to replicate themselves via sexual selection That would make all present genes equally good since they all exist >Honor or the lack of honor, can't be passed onto your children Would make selection very purposeless >Writing to IQ estimator kek

>>25486006 >>A. Prone to replicate themselves via sexual selection >That would make all present genes equally good since they all exist Well, you have a point in the sense that it's hard to objectively find a global evaluation function for genetic quality. However, the genes of Genghis Khan and a random worker in a city that refused to surrender to him existed at the same time. The difference is that the direct genetic lineage of the worker was wiped out, while Genghis Khan had 100s of children. Technically you can only objectively evaluate the quality of someones genes after they die, because someone could father 10 children after turning 80. But in general, because sexual selection via female opinion dominates nowadays, uploading 6 natural pictures of yourself to Tinder and recording the number of likes you get from women in one week is probably highly correlated with the quality of your genes. >>Honor or the lack of honor, can't be passed onto your children >Would make selection very purposeless Life has no inherent meaning. Your genes are interested in replicating themselves because the ones that had no such interest died out.

>>25486045 But can Genkhis Khan play nice piana? Didnd't think so, checkmate "evolutionary psychologists"

Cool. Who is the happy father?

>>25486045 >Gengis Khan (first king of Finland) and random worker tale That is another issue, that doesn't necessarily has to do with genes. Maybe they were genetically identical, which makes selection sometimes meaningless in selecting. >Life has no inherent meaning Well, that's another matter. You asked what life I'd rather live and I answered.

Thanks for keeping me updated on that recent happening

>>25486129 the last dick pushes out all the other seed. the baby is BLACK 100%

>>25485965 But intelligence and amount of offspring is inversely correlated among males.

>>25486186 He was 1000th, not 1057th

>>25486186 >and that's how I met your mother capcthe: fuhked lol

>>25486188 That's due to dysgenic practices by the state, that promotes the breeding of undesirables. If I woke up tomorrow and decides to kill every woman who is not hideously deformed, I guess you could say that beauty would be evolutionary disfavored in that scenario, but this is a temporary, artificial issue. The laws of nature can only be overcome for a short while until the consequences catch up to you. But there is also truth in the statement that a higher IQ isn't inherently good in all natural environments. A higher IQ = a larger brain makes the organism more vulnerable, more resource intensive, childbirth is more difficult, and probably the biggest issue is generating abstraction to such a degree that reproduction becomes a secondary issue behind climbing the social ladder and non-productive pleasure. In terms of sexual selection, several studies show that women prefer an IQ of roughly 120, top 10%, just like they prefer height in the top 20%. Both of these traits have diminishing returns, an IQ of 140 is less attractive than 120, and a height of 7' is less attractive than 6'. >>25486167 >Well, that's another matter. You asked what life I'd rather live and I answered. I respect your choice. >>25486061 He would've gotten even more pussy in that case for sure

>>25486186 Damn, imagine you're a mutt and your mom is a famous record-setting whore

Oh dog, I thought it was the other whore. I liked this one better.

>>25486443 the kid will be glad it is only half a nigger and not a full nigger

reminder chuds, all women are queens, so she is.